Comments Thread For: Wilder on Fury: Thank God I Had Smart Judges, He Did Nothing

[hugh grant]

Ha ha at least wilder heard the voice of people saying he lost 10-2.
But no point in trying to convince wilder he lost he's stubborn.
But when the decision was announced wilder looked more happy. That's all im saying

[kiDynamite92]

Thankfully the people know the truth, Wilder lost to Charlie Zelenhoff because he should have been disqualified after he tried to hit him when Charlie was on the ground. The fraud is in denial. Zelenhoff > Wilder.

[Tecnoworld]

Two great boxers and a great show, that's what I personally witnessed. Both have their strenghts and weaknesses, but they are #1 (and 1) in today's boxing.

[DaNeutral.]

Wilder sounds like LDBC. But let's look at his body language at the end of the 12th, that was the body language of somebody who knew they had just lost and had to be told to celebrate in case uncle Al had Been busy with the little secret envelopes.

Wilder is fooling nobody he knows he lost that fight and if he feels fury did nothing in the fight neither did wilder cuz they scored it a robbery draw.

[DuckAdonis]

Wilder didn't even put his hands in the air after the fight. Enough said

He knew he lost, you almost never see that

[Nash out]

I'm a massive fan of both fighters. Fury is my fav fighter and Wilder is my 2nd fav HW. The look at the relief of Wilder's face after it is called a draw says it all. Fury won 9 clear rounds, round 2 could have went either way, and Wilder won two 10-8 rounds, although he got his ass kicked in R12 after the knockdown.

Also, sometimes people don't seem to understand what winning a clear round means, by mentioning only landing x amount of punches. This is very common at heavyweight, a boxer can still win a round narrowly, but clearly, as Fury did nearly every round here, and as FMJ often did, and many other greats did. Check the scoring criteria, then watch the rounds based on those criteria's and you'll see Fury won easily.

Another thing when factoring in "effective aggression" A lot of people just count POWER as effective aggression. It isn't. Wilder hits a lot harder than Fury (though Fury hits quite hard) but Fury's aggression in most rounds was more effective than Wilder's. And in the other three categories, it was a landslide.

[Straightener]

*** BENT judges ***

[thereeldeel]

i gave first five rounds to wilder, plus round 9 and 12! He truly did win. But we know the narrative they try to paint! Lol. People gave fury rounds for ducking punches! Lol. Smh!!!

sheeeeeeeeeeiiittt!!!!

[Zn1]

Al Haymon bought 2 of the judges like he has for many of Wilder's fights

[ceylon mooney]

I gave first five rounds to Wilder, plus round 9 and 12! He truly did win. But we know the narrative they try to paint! Lol. People gave Fury rounds for ducking punches! Lol. SMH!!!

your scoring is flat out wrong.

but you are correct about furys defense.

professional boxing is scored on 4 criteria:

1. clean punches landed
2. defense
3. effective aggression
4. ring generalship

according to the scoring criteria of professional boxing, fury won 9-3. with the knockdowns fury wins 115-111.

wilder is my favorite heavyweight by a country mile. ive spent a lot of money and driven hundreds of miles to sit on floor seats and see him do his thing. but, even if i dont like it, there is a scoring criteria, and liking a fighter doesnt magically transform the scoring criteria and make my guy win a fight he clearly lost.

boxing is so crooked, and we all know that, but we can all know the scoring criteria just as well. its not a secret.