Comments Thread For: Hearn: Ruiz Can't Moan About Neutral Venue For Joshua Rematch

[Jab jab boom]

Lmao I dont drink and I certainly dont take drugs. That's more ur thing

Ok what disadvantages did Fury have? How about Lewis in the first fight? You seem so eager to ignore the obvious bias.

Facts are the US have some truly awful decisions some of the most controversial decisions have happened in the US. But being a casual with limited knowledge you aren't aware of this.

Keep telling everyone how you dont get home advantage, the rest of us will just keep laughing at you

no drinking or drugs? That's horrible. This means that you're just naturally ******. You couldn't name any disadvantages that Joshua faced so you're deflecting. You're ignoring the difference between home field advantage and bias for A sides vs B sides and lead promotors pulling shady strings to benefit their fighters. That's not home field advantage, that's bias and corruption. Joshua faced none of that because he was the A side and it was his promotor who was running the show. And like I said, to boot he had the crowd support. Just accept inferiority, you and your country should be used to that by now.

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Jab jab boom;20017766]no drinking or drugs? That's horrible.

Maybe for you, I realize that's a staple diet for some Americans but I personally like to live clean. Again if there is no home advantage then explain what happened when Fury was robbed against Wilder or when Lewis was robbed in the first fight. I realize ur ****** and have a low attention span but try and at least focus on the question

[Jab jab boom]

[QUOTE=LetOutTheCage;20018399]

no drinking or drugs? That's horrible.

Maybe for you, I realize that's a staple diet for some Americans but I personally like to live clean. Again if there is no home advantage then explain what happened when Fury was robbed against Wilder or when Lewis was robbed in the first fight. I realize ur ****** and have a low attention span but try and at least focus on the question

you conveniently left out the next sentence of my post which mentions that if you don't do drugs or drink, then that means that you're just naturally ******. Which was then further confirmed by your following statements because you go on to ask a question that I already answered specifically in my pervious post. Not only that, you still have yet to answer the question of, what disadvantages did Joshua have when facing ruiz. You're clearly an inbred brit who is incapable of having a valid debate. Therefore I will move on and allow you to stew in your loss, inferiority and ******ity.

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Jab jab boom;20018780]

you conveniently left out the next sentence of my post which mentions that if you don't do drugs or drink, then that means that you're just naturally ******. Which was then further confirmed by your following statements because you go on to ask a question that I already answered specifically in my pervious post. Not only that, you still have yet to answer the question of, what disadvantages did Joshua have when facing ruiz. You're clearly an inbred brit who is incapable of having a valid debate. Therefore I will move on and allow you to stew in your loss, inferiority and ******ity.

You haven't answered my question, stop deflecting did Wilder get a home decision against Fury yes or no? same thing with Holyfield vs Lewis one.

Lol@inbred that's for more a problem I hear in the US

Answer the question kid and stop trying to deflect with your childish insults, all it shows how idiotic you truly are.

[Marchegiano]

[QUOTE=LetOutTheCage;20018877]

You haven't answered my question, stop deflecting did Wilder get a home decision against Fury yes or no? same thing with Holyfield vs Lewis one.

Lol@inbred that's for more a problem I hear in the US

Answer the question kid and stop trying to deflect with your childish insults, all it shows how idiotic you truly are.

Not at all, fans cry every single time they don't agree with judging and when they cry they offer their supposed reasons for the judgement.

Are those reasons ever anything to do with actual techniques used? **** no, it's always some form of corruption. I don't know why y'all ****s even watch this sport. From your perspective about a tenth of boxing is fake as ****.

When you explain scoring to a new fan youse will explain "it's whatever the judges are looking for really" but then when it comes time to put that idea into action those voicing a technical reasoning for the popular and favored fighter's loss are in the minority.

When your man loses y'all cry some really absurd **** and measure your ability to guess reasoning with how many crybaby *****es agree with y'all.

It's a ****in' lame excuse. Every goddamn time.

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Marchegiano;20018899]

Not at all, fans cry every single time they don't agree with judging and when they cry they offer their supposed reasons for the judgement.

Are those reasons ever anything to do with actual techniques used? **** no, it's always some form of corruption. I don't know why y'all ****s even watch this sport. From your perspective about a tenth of boxing is fake as ****.

When you explain scoring to a new fan youse will explain "it's whatever the judges are looking for really" but then when it comes time to put that idea into action those voicing a technical reasoning for the popular and favored fighter's loss are in the minority.

When your man loses y'all cry some really absurd **** and measure your ability to guess reasoning with how many crybaby *****es agree with y'all.

It's a ****in' lame excuse. Every goddamn time.

Lewis and Fury didnt lose if you think the US have no home decisions then I have nothing to discuss with you

[Jab jab boom]

[QUOTE=Marchegiano;20018899]

Not at all, fans cry every single time they don't agree with judging and when they cry they offer their supposed reasons for the judgement.

Are those reasons ever anything to do with actual techniques used? **** no, it's always some form of corruption. I don't know why y'all ****s even watch this sport. From your perspective about a tenth of boxing is fake as ****.

When you explain scoring to a new fan youse will explain "it's whatever the judges are looking for really" but then when it comes time to put that idea into action those voicing a technical reasoning for the popular and favored fighter's loss are in the minority.

When your man loses y'all cry some really absurd **** and measure your ability to guess reasoning with how many crybaby *****es agree with y'all.

It's a ****in' lame excuse. Every goddamn time.

the guy is just a whiney complainer who has excuses as to why his fighter Joshua got whooped in his last fight. He blames favoritism in the US and brings up fury and Lewis as examples. He ignores that Lewis chose to spend most of his career fighting in the US and fury is currently making the same choice. Would that be the case if they really felt that they couldn't get a fair shake in the US??

[LetOutTheCage]

[QUOTE=Jab jab boom;20019016]

the guy is just a whiney complainer who has excuses as to why his fighter Joshua got whooped in his last fight. He blames favoritism in the US and brings up fury and Lewis as examples. He ignores that Lewis chose to spend most of his career fighting in the US and fury is currently making the same choice. Would that be the case if they really felt that they couldn't get a fair shake in the US??

Lol so you couldn't answer a simple question and continue to deflect, I never once mentioned Joshua here but nice trying to lie and put words in my mouth.

keep telling yourself that there are no home advantages in the US you delusional gimp.

[Marchegiano]

[QUOTE=LetOutTheCage;20018914]

Lewis and Fury didnt lose if you think the US have no home decisions then I have nothing to discuss with you

You can just say nana nana boo boo stick yer head in doo doo and it'd be pretty much the same response.

Childish, close minded, and nothing more.

[Marchegiano]

[QUOTE=LetOutTheCage;20019037]

Lol so you couldn't answer a simple question and continue to deflect, I never once mentioned Joshua here but nice trying to lie and put words in my mouth.

keep telling yourself that there are no home advantages in the US you delusional gimp.

I dunno what's going on with the quote system.

I don't really care about the specific names y'all're talking about. My point is very simple. Every single time there's a scorecard fans don't agree with they rationalize the score with corruption rather than alternative perspective from an actual expert.

You can point to which ever fights you think were most corrupt, I don't really give a ****, doesn't actually change my point at all. It hardly even addresses it.

Here's something, if I look at your history with controversial calls specifically will I ever see you talking about the judge's perspective or will I only find more crying about corruption?