Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Ruiz Dares Joshua: You Can Whoop Me in Tijuana? Prove It!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
    Just listened to it.

    Russ mentioned glove tampering but never said that Whyte used steroids or said the gloves were loaded. Abner's classification for glove tampering is that he did not have a chance to see the gloves.

    Abner said the whyte camp did not stop anyone from seeing the gloves the British boxing board of control did.

    After cross referencing different articles all I can find is that Whyte switched gloves. No proof that the gloves used were altered. Saying that the gloves were loaded is a real reach.

    Comment


      Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
      When the little fat man gets beat, I'll remind you of your incredibly ****** comments.
      And I will simply remind you of June 1, 2019! That azz whoopin' is historical!

      Comment


        Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
        Just listened to it.

        Russ mentioned glove tampering but never said that Whyte used steroids or said the gloves were loaded. Abner's classification for glove tampering is that he did not have a chance to see the gloves.

        Abner said the whyte camp did not stop anyone from seeing the gloves the British boxing board of control did.

        After cross referencing different articles all I can find is that Whyte switched gloves. No proof that the gloves used were altered. Saying that the gloves were loaded is a real reach.
        The term “loaded” also gets used for swapping 8oz with 10oz. Or for removing padding. Any glove tampering is considered having “loaded gloves.” I wasn’t implying he had dipped his wraps in glue and glass but not being allowed to examine the gloves and switching them at the last second after having meetings over the gloves is crooked no matter what way you cut it. Know why there’s “no proof?” Because nobody would allow the gloves to be looked at or touched, before or after the fight. Whyte didn’t even take his gloves off in the ring, he rushed backstage to do it. When have you ever seen a fighter not rush to get his gloves and wraps taken off the moment the fight is done?

        And no, Anber didn’t mention steroids. His failed PED test did. Even Hearn has mentioned “adverse findings” and while everyone is saying that Whyte tested positive for DBol, nobody at matchroom is denying it either.

        Comment


          Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
          Joshua wouldn’t get a shot right away at any of the titles. He’s ranked too low.

          And how ****ing sad must your life be if you’re hoping a man loses his home? I feel bad for you.
          You don't have to feel bad for me dude - if you look at what I said, I didn't saying anything about losing the house, I said; 'I bet that nice mansion he bought would suddenly seem a bit of an excessive purchase.' insinuating that he would need all the cash he can get to fight the legal case.

          But thanks for jumping the gun.

          Comment


            Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
            The term “loaded” also gets used for swapping 8oz with 10oz. Or for removing padding. Any glove tampering is considered having “loaded gloves.” I wasn’t implying he had dipped his wraps in glue and glass but not being allowed to examine the gloves and switching them at the last second after having meetings over the gloves is crooked no matter what way you cut it. Know why there’s “no proof?” Because nobody would allow the gloves to be looked at or touched, before or after the fight. Whyte didn’t even take his gloves off in the ring, he rushed backstage to do it. When have you ever seen a fighter not rush to get his gloves and wraps taken off the moment the fight is done?

            And no, Anber didn’t mention steroids. His failed PED test did. Even Hearn has mentioned “adverse findings” and while everyone is saying that Whyte tested positive for DBol, nobody at matchroom is denying it either.
            Was there something abnormal? Yes. Only one person implied dianabol specifically, one writer from one small web site and everyone refers back to that one article. Vada said there is nothing there.
            Last edited by factsarenice; 08-08-2019, 05:55 AM.

            Comment


              Originally posted by MastaBlasta View Post
              Just because we didn't get to see AJ lose in a "patient" fight doesn't mean he can win that way. There are gonna be moments throughout where Andy is gonna **** him, unless he runs all night. I doubt he can run all night and win a title back, even in the UK. Joshua is gonna have a war on his hands unless he can find a way to hurt Ruiz.

              Wherever the fight goes, if AJ wins any type of shaky, boring, questionable, lackluster decision his legacy will be ruined forever. He's gonna have to win a FIGHT.
              So you're saying that Joshua needs a highlight reel KO in order for the boxing community to re-recognise him as the unified champ?

              Comment


                Originally posted by OnlytheTruth View Post
                You don't have to feel bad for me dude - if you look at what I said, I didn't saying anything about losing the house, I said; 'I bet that nice mansion he bought would suddenly seem a bit of an excessive purchase.' insinuating that he would need all the cash he can get to fight the legal case.

                But thanks for jumping the gun.
                You said “I’d like to see him turn it down so he can spend his time in court, then his purchases would seem excessive”

                Implies that you want to see him in financial duress. If I misjudged, my apologies.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
                  Was there something abnormal? Yes, but only person implied dianabol specifically, one writer from one web site and everyone refers back to that one article.
                  You mean this website?

                  And the writer being someone who’s been involved in boxing writing for decades?

                  And why hasn’t Eddie said “DBol? No way!” Instead “yes there was an adverse finding and that’s all you’ll ever find out!” SMOKE BOMB!!

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by _Rexy_ View Post
                    You mean this website?

                    And the writer being someone who’s been involved in boxing writing for decades?

                    And why hasn’t Eddie said “DBol? No way!” Instead “yes there was an adverse finding and that’s all you’ll ever find out!” SMOKE BOMB!!
                    Could be, I'll wait for the verdict.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
                      Could be, I'll wait for the verdict.
                      Do you know how many times a B sample has come back different from the A sample?

                      WADA even made a statement last year that they were considering getting rid of the B Sample thing, since it's a time waster that never comes back different.


                      But we can wait. Thats fine. We'll likely never get an honest answer though

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP