Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson: If Joshua's Mind is F***ed Up, He Won't Beat Ruiz

[NoConcoms]

WTF does 2pac have to do with this. God your an imbecile.

Most likely racist. One of those people who refers to Ali as a draft dodger. (There was an agenda there as well. Look into it.)

[Jkp]

No PED's can help him if his ability to take a punch has been compromised.

True, but hes going to look fantastic ripped and muscled like a body builder when hes lying on the canvas.

[strykr619]

Most likely racist. One of those people who refers to Ali as a draft dodger. (There was an agenda there as well. Look into it.)

I respect Ali's for drafting maintaining due to his beliefs, i didn't like how he lampooned Joe Frazier after knowing that Joe was helping him out financially and with the various boxing commissions when he was suspended.

[pollywog]

Haha...Do you even pride negro?

[Roberto Vasquez]

No one questioned Ali before he lost. Plenty questioned AJ before his first loss. Further, best win was against a guy who retired afterward. The Ruiz loss answered questions about resume and ability....it didn't create them. KO loss plus the context of Parker and Povetkin doesn't bode well for arguing that AJ has the best resume (record).

What you're saying makes no sense. Because if you are criticising Povetkin and Parker then you have to so the same with the other top heavyweights. E.g Wilder's best opponents Stiverne (old), Ortiz(very old), and Fury (fat and had been retired for 2 years)

Fury - Wilder (good draw with Wilder but would have been KO'd if that fight had been in UK) ,Wlad (old), Chisora (good but not great fighter)

Look at the Ring top 10 rated heavyweights - AJ has has fought 4 of them and beaten 3. Fury has fought one. Wilder has fought 2 and beaten one

AJ has had 23 fights
Fury has had 29 fights
Wilder has had 44 fights

I'm not saying that AJ is better than Wilder or Fury. Personally I would rate Wilder as no.1, FUry at no.2 at the moment. But that's just speculation until they fight better opponents. My point is that AJ 100% does have the best record.

AJ fought Ruiz while Wilder fought Breazeale and Fury fought Schwarz. Even you must be able to see who is taking risks...

[Ake-Dawg]

What you're saying makes no sense. Because if you are criticising Povetkin and Parker then you have to so the same with the other top heavyweights. E.g Wilder's best opponents Stiverne (old), Ortiz(very old), and Fury (fat and had been retired for 2 years)

Fury - Wilder (good draw with Wilder but would have been KO'd if that fight had been in UK) ,Wlad (old), Chisora (good but not great fighter)

Look at the Ring top 10 rated heavyweights - AJ has has fought 4 of them and beaten 3. Fury has fought one. Wilder has fought 2 and beaten one

AJ has had 23 fights
Fury has had 29 fights
Wilder has had 44 fights

I'm not saying that AJ is better than Wilder or Fury. Personally I would rate Wilder as no.1, FUry at no.2 at the moment. But that's just speculation until they fight better opponents. My point is that AJ 100% does have the best record.

AJ fought Ruiz while Wilder fought Breazeale and Fury fought Schwarz. Even you must be able to see who is taking risks...

Ruiz was not considered a risk. A live dog by some, yes, but not a risk.
Parker...well he confirmed who he was vs Whyte. Not a bum but average. Good skills but not enough power. Povetkin has been living off his PED reputation. Very skilled but not enough stamina or power in a VADA tested fight to beat the big heavies.