Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why does GGG always get credit for imaginary wins???
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postwhich one of the scrubs on G's resume, could have beaten Canelo?
name him..... ?
this will be funny
name him, Tony Baloney !!
FACT: the best win on Golovkin's resume was a HUGE underdog
think about that
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.. View PostHas he defeated anyone who was even close to great?? only 5 were even world champs for crying out loud...0 hall of famers..NONE!!!! what are you celebrating is the better question
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)
Comment
-
Originally posted by ruedboy View PostYou don't get it. "Great" is a judgement. It can't be proven the way you can prove a fighter's won and loss record. A person can have an "educated" opinion or the y can be totally ignorant. Since opinions by their nature can't be proven or disproved, what's the sense of an argument that has no satisfactory ending.
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)
Comment
-
these are the 5 champs GGG has defeated..
Kassim Ouma, Daniel Geale, David Lemieux, Kell Brook, and Daniel Jacobs.
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.. View PostHas he defeated anyone who was even close to great?? only 5 were even world champs for crying out loud...0 hall of famers..NONE!!!! what are you celebrating is the better question
A quick example. "Alvarez destroyed GGG in the 2nd Fight." (Judgement)
"Alvarez won the 2nd fight by a MD." (Fact)
I don't argue opinions.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ruedboy View PostYou don't get it. "Great" is a judgement. It can't be proven the way you can prove a fighter's won and loss record. A person can have an "educated" opinion or the y can be totally ignorant. Since opinions by their nature can't be proven or disproved, what's the sense of an argument that has no satisfactory ending.
I can tell you've got some strong opinions about Golovkin. if you can come up with some facts {things that can be verified) I'm happy to continue the discussion.
Ex."Floyd was great" (Opinion) "Floyd was 50-0"(Fact)
it can so
why are you so eager to ride the short-bus with the other casuals?
beating a good fighter............ is a good win
beating a very good fighter..... is a very good win
beating an excellent fighter..... is an excellent win
beating a great fighter............ is a great win
this is Golovkin's resume'.....
NOTE: I only count opponents who are better than " good "
- Jacobs *
- Murray
2x good, to very-good, wins
conclusion: Golovkin is a good, to very good, fighter
FACT: the best win on Golovkin's resume was a HUGE underdog who nobody gave a chance
FACT: the best win on Canelo's resume is a supposed killer who nobody thought he could beat
BIG diff there !!
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.. View Postthese are the 5 champs GGG has defeated..
Kassim Ouma, Daniel Geale, David Lemieux, Kell Brook, and Daniel Jacobs.
two of those guys were decidedly average
one of them did not belong at middleweight
one was better than average, but then got stopped by a guy who weighed 153
Jacobs was a HUGE underdog, and nobody gave him a chance
#average
Comment
Comment