Who knows better how to score a boxing match?

[Boxing_1013]

was Weisfeld wrong when he awarded the rematch to Canelo, or not?

I mean are you really trying to argue that Canelo gets correct cards in Vegas bro...let's ask CJ Ross or Byrd about that lol :0

He is the cash king...if he is competitive in a fight he will probably get it...just the way it is, no problem with it really on my end. To beat the king you've got to kill him sometimes and GGG didn't do that...he clearly won the boxing matches though, no real debate about that my friend.

[Boxing_1013]

[B][SIZE="5"]it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO
]

Dude hold on - Trying to learn here - so 'not getting your game going' 'getting beaten up' and 'missing 1000 punches' over two fights are scoring criteria...man that's odd stuff to be criteria, but OK nice...just link me that stuff about that please. Would love to have that info for future fights and discussions.

Also - myself and many others have posted stuff like this for you many times my friend...why do you keep making the same comments? Here is what a top judge said he and every other top judge looks for in fights:

Clean punches: To me, clean punches are the most important aspect, and the other factors are really tied to that. Take the phrase, "effective aggressiveness." How is a boxer effective? He's effective by landing clean punches. How about "defense?" A boxer shows great defense by not getting hit with clean punches. And, finally, the term "ring generalship." A boxer uses the ring to put himself in a position to land clean punches.


All the judges feel that stuff is important...but only insofar as those things help the fighter to land punches my friend...that's what boxing is all about lol. Defense is important because it negates your opponent from scoring...Ring generalship important because it allows you to score...same with effective aggression my friend...

Anyway have a good night man, I know it is late (or early) over there in the UK ;0

[aboutfkntime]

Dude hold on - Trying to learn here - so 'not getting your game going' 'getting beaten up' and 'missing 1000 punches' over two fights are scoring criteria...man that's odd stuff to be criteria, but OK nice...just link me that stuff about that please.

Would love to have that info for future fights and discussions.

Also - myself and many others have posted stuff like this for you many times my friend...why do you keep making the same comments? Here is what a top judge said he and every other top judge looks for in fights:

Clean punches: To me, clean punches are the most important aspect, and the other factors are really tied to that. Take the phrase, "effective aggressiveness." How is a boxer effective? He's effective by landing clean punches. How about "defense?" A boxer shows great defense by not getting hit with clean punches. And, finally, the term "ring generalship." A boxer uses the ring to put himself in a position to land clean punches.

All the judges feel that stuff is important...but only insofar as those things help the fighter to land punches my friend...that's what boxing is all about lol. Defense is important because it negates your opponent from scoring...Ring generalship important because it allows you to score...same with effective aggression my friend...

Anyway have a good night man, I know it is late (or early) over there in the UK ;0

you are an absolute moron

so, Plodkin missing 1000+ punches had nothing to do with Canelo's defence?..... defence, ya know..... the dirty word you hate, that just so happens to be one of the 4 official scoring criteria LMAO

and, Plodkin being completely unable to get his game going, and inflict his style upon his opponent (in either fight)..... really had nothing to do with the excellent ring generalship and control that we saw from the smaller man, Canelo?

ring generalship, ya know..... the 2nd of the 4 official scoring criteria that you prefer to completely ignore lol

oh, and..... Plodkin getting beaten up, and lumped up..... really had nothing to do with the sharp HARD judge-friendly punches that Canelo was bouncing off his face..... with that excellent display of effective aggression by the smaller man Canelo when he backed-up and beaten-up Plodkin

effective aggression..... ya know, the 3rd of the 4 official scoring criteria that you want to burn, you fool

you literally need to remove 3 of the 4 official scoring criteria, and then butcher the 4th..... in order to have the slightest argument that Golovkin won


the way that some of you guys loudly declared how easy it was to score a fight..... but then immediately proved that you don't even know the basics..... (that not all landed punches score)..... (and that all 4 official criteria are valid at ALL times, with clean hard punching being the main criteria)..... was funny as hell, seriously


btw..... who is this guy, genius..... ?





Steve Weisfeld says.....


[IMG]//media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]

[aboutfkntime]

it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO

[Boxing_1013]

you are an absolute moron

so, Plodkin missing 1000+ punches had nothing to do with Canelo's defence?..... defence, ya know..... the dirty word you hate, that just so happens to be one of the 4 official scoring criteria LMAO

and, Plodkin being completely unable to get his game going, and inflict his style upon his opponent (in either fight)..... really had nothing to do with the excellent ring generalship and control that we saw from the smaller man, Canelo?

ring generalship, ya know..... the 2nd of the 4 official scoring criteria that you prefer to completely ignore lol

oh, and..... Plodkin getting beaten up, and lumped up..... really had nothing to do with the sharp HARD judge-friendly punches that Canelo was bouncing off his face..... with that excellent display of effective aggression by the smaller man Canelo when he backed-up and beaten-up Plodkin

effective aggression..... ya know, the 3rd of the 4 official scoring criteria that you want to burn, you fool

you literally need to remove 3 of the 4 official scoring criteria, and then butcher the 4th..... in order to have the slightest argument that Golovkin won


the way that some of you guys loudly declared how easy it was to score a fight..... but then immediately proved that you don't even know the basics..... (that not all landed punches score)..... (and that all 4 official criteria are valid at ALL times, with clean hard punching being the main criteria)..... was funny as hell, seriously


btw..... who is this guy, genius..... ?





Steve Weisfeld says.....


[IMG]//media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]

Lol...bro...you're not even reading what I am writing lol...

[R-Hand Southpaw]

FACT: when you said this.....



..... you were talking through a MASSIVE hole in your ass

how did that hole get so MASSIVE..... ?

learn the sport, and stop making up rubbish to defend your hypejob

7.32

Where in the world do people actually say "rubbish"?

[aboutfkntime]

Lol...bro...you're not even reading what I am writing lol...

I bolded the part of your post that I replied to

of course I read it, before I bolded/replied

the way that some of you guys loudly declared how easy it was to score a fight..... but then immediately proved that you don't even know the basics..... (that not all landed punches score)..... (and that all 4 official criteria are valid at ALL times, with clean hard punching being the main criteria)..... was funny as hell, seriously


Steve Weisfeld says.....


[IMG]//media3.*****.com/media/33bpFN25l6qNW/*****.gif[/IMG]

[aboutfkntime]

Where in the world do people actually say "rubbish"?

everywhere in the world they don't say "garbage"

[aboutfkntime]

it is truly hilarious, that fans of the guy who missed 1000+ punches... who could not get his game going... and who got beaten up..... do not appreciate defense, ring generalship, and clean hard punching LMAO

..... no no, " volume "..... is suddenly more important than the OFFICIAL scoring criteria LMAO

[Boxing_1013]

Where in the world do people actually say "rubbish"?

Dude I used to think he was trolling lol...But I honestly worry about his sanity...he seems almost literally insane to me, it's sad.

Edit- sorry Time, meant to send that as a PM...no offense intended my friend...still think you are a decent guy but I worry about ya sometimes.