Not sure I believe these stats, I would have to watch again but it didn’t appear like over 40% of Canelo landed.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Canelo Alvarez vs. Daniel Jacobs - CompuBox Punch Stats
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Red Skull View Post40% accuracy, give me a god damn break! Is there not even any legitimacy to people who are recording the punches, I mean you could easily have them watch the entire fight over a few more times to get accurate results.
Compubox
Canelo
Total shots
188 of 466 (40%)
Jabs
68 of 202 (34%)
Power shots
120 of 264 (46%)
Jacobs
Total shots
131 of 649 (20%)
Jabs
42 of 290 (15%)
Power shots
89 of 359 (25%)
Comment
-
People are sheep and not intelligent enough to think for themselves
Its why they blindly follow stats
E.g. arguments that canelo won the round because he outlanded jacobs in power shots
No power shot is the same
Canelo and jacobs landed 9 each in the 9th round but jacobs landed a huge shot. Even if canelo had landed a few more average shots would you give the round to canelo or jacobs? You dont even know how to answer
If canelo is p4p 1 then ggg and jacobs should be in your top 5 since the fights were so close..
But jacobs wont feature that high
People are fanboys
If canelo wasnt popular he would have at least 1 loss vs ggg. And he wouldnt be considered by some as p4p
So if you get to the crux of it, people are holding in canelo in high regard because he has fans
Its pathetic and indicative of how dumb people are when it comes to boxing
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostAll the GGG fans and Canelo haters staying away from this thread like the plague lmao
Comment
-
Originally posted by Red Skull View PostDoesn't look that way to me, I think Compubox must have some blind people tallying the punch total. Shots slapping the arm and impressively missing wild aren't punches that should be counted.
Comment
-
I don’t agree with the compubox stats for rounds 7-11. Watching it live, I thought Jacobs controlled those rounds with the jab. Jacobs threw a lot of “pawing and range finder” jabs, but I thought he landed at a higher percentage than 20%. Jacobs landed quite a few jabs to the body
Comment
-
Originally posted by dmb2live View PostI don’t agree with the compubox stats for rounds 7-11. Watching it live, I thought Jacobs controlled those rounds with the jab. Jacobs threw a lot of “pawing and range finder” jabs, but I thought he landed at a higher percentage than 20%. Jacobs landed quite a few jabs to the body
Comment
Comment