Originally posted by TonyGe
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: 30-Day Weights: Canelo Alvarez 168.2, Daniel Jacobs 175.4
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Postnope, wrong yet again. The only ones who think like you are Canelo nut huggers. Anyone with sense knows better. There are A side demands and then blatant lowball offers to avoid the fight. see what was offered and what ggg earned just to prove the point of how ridiculous it was. I know it's hard for you to accept because past Mexicans never used to duck. But unfortunately for you, that's exactly what your hero did. Aren't you smart enough to realize that once GGG hit 35 years old and showed some vulnerability that all of a sudden the cheap weight excuses and flat fee offers suddenly disappeared and negotiations were no longer a problem? Don't be ******, even though that's nearly impossible for Canelo fans.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostSee the difference between me and you is that i speak facts, and I don't get caught up in emotions. I did not call you names at all so who is the one getting caught up with his fanboyism... Wasn't triple jab running his mouth at the time that he didn't fight for money he fought for legacy and all his "belts"? That's one, two... It's no one's fault but triple jabs that he started to get fame and big fights at his age. Wasn't he built on his amateur record? Didn't he then pro late in life? That's all him and has nothing to do with canelo. So stop it with the childish name calling and accept that you were one of the 97k fans that ate up all his b.s.... Let me guess... Don't write a essay you won't read it? Lmao please you stay getting owned by me son
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostHe wanted 55 that's mw get it straight. And as the a side, he had the right to demand what he wanted. Triple jab didn't accept so he had to wait
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View PostAll you're doing is exposing your Mexican bias. Everyone knows that he ducked the fight. Matter of fact, let's do this. Since you like writing novels. Write into breads mailbag on this site and ask him whose team was at fault for Canelo vs ggg not happening earlier. Then write into Dougs mail bag (who works for golden boy) on the ring site and ask him the same question. Let's bet accounts on who they put the blame on. Ggg for not accepting a flat fee or Canelo /golden boy for not wanting to make the fight during that time. Then you'll see how you're the one who deals with emotion and bias.... 0 facts. I'm really starting to wonder if it's bias that keeps you from accepting the truth or plain ******ity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostThe is no such thing as an A side that automatically gets everything they want no matter how deluded they are.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostI don't care what Doug or bread say, they get told what to say and get paid for it. I see things and analyze on my own and come up own... I don't depend on third parties to come up with a conclusion of any situation for myself and that goes for boxing and in reak life. You believe what you want, I know canelo was down as the a side to fight at 55 and offered triple jab 3-5 times his biggest pay day and the boy said no. He said no because he wanted only the belts and he wasn't interested in the money he just wanted to unify the mw division... But look at him now... He said he will fight the best no matter if it's for a belt or not and enter ndam and some other guy who I never even heard if. I won't make no bet with you based on what people think... I'll bet you canelo will go undefeated this 2019 and triple jab will fight at least one bum... Take it or leave it
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jab jab boom View PostNice job backing out of getting an UNBIASED opinion. You operate strictly on nationalism but get cold feet when it comes down to backing it up. Just like you tried to bet accounts that benavidez would beat Crawford. I took you up on the offer and you backed out as soon as I did. Because you realized that you don't think logically when it comes to boxing. It's strictly a pro mexico agenda. As far as Canelo in 2019, its real easy for you to have that confidence when the guy has never had a bad scorecard go against him, but has had countless ridiculous scorecards in his favor. Bottom line, you backed out of trying to prove your point so I can no longer take you or your posts seriously. You've been exposed.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robi13 View PostI agree but what about triple jab stating anyone from 54-68 won't go 12.. What about him willing to go to 64 for Chavez and 54 for Floyd.. But not 55 for canelo... Csnekk went to 60 for triple jab when he didn't have too
BS that you guys always resort to when you run out of rational ideas.
Comment
Comment