Comments Thread For: Eubank Jr: DeGale Grudge Match is Up There with Froch-Groves 1

[apollocreed]

they are the same fights,not "also". Two fights, hich wr good, noone disputes that.

obviously you know that Ottke unified, so I will give you a pass for trying to be devious there. He also defended the unified crown 4 times, joe managed once. Comparing Joes one unified to Ottkes 4 is a joke!

but not really, they both defended against mediocrity for the most part. Same joke then, though I would argue Joes is a little better given the kessler and old hopkins names. It odd how Sven didnt make it into HoF when he had the same reason as Joe for getting in, those 20 defences I expect because he lost so many of them really whereas Joe only arguably lost one (reid) and perhaps was "saved by the ref" in one.

Now heres the most bizarre thing, Groves, DeGale and Calzaghe are all from Hammersmith. Seems that England-born SMWs have an affinity for coming from old Hammertown.

I'm not wasting any more time on you. Calzaghe clearly beat Reid, all Robin was doing was lining up the big right hand counter all night.
Ottke didn't win all four belts, which is rare in any weight class.
Like I've said several times, many journalists, websites etc, including this one, have bestowed ATG status on Calzaghe.
He's been voted in the HOF.
Those opinions carry a whole lot more weight than yours. To be honest, your opinions mean absolutely **** all. So like I said, I'm not wasting any more time on you.

[apollocreed]

yeh i read it, in 2008. Vs shot jones, what a surprise, the one that lebedev and enzo can easy knock out. I'd suggest that the reason you cant find it is that you probably know its an opinion against a shot jones.

No, Steward clearly says against any version of Jones. I can't make it any more simple for you to understand.
He says 'Calzaghe would have been a threat for Jones at any stage'.
And you wouldn't have read it, because he said it during the live commentary.

[DreamFighter]

No, Steward clearly says against any version of Jones. I can't make it any more simple for you to understand.
He says 'Calzaghe would have been a threat for Jones at any stage'.

a threat, not win. you lied again. please stop lying, it kills your credibility.

And you wouldnt have read it

unless someone quoted him. dig it deeper.

[DreamFighter]

I'm not wasting any more time on you.

you just did by making another post. dont lie mate.

Calzaghe clearly beat Reid, all Robin was doing was lining up the big right hand counter all night.

plenty say he lost, so its arguable both ways. Reid landed a higher %, he was more accurate and more damaging.

whatever the case, joe went right back to facing a string of bums, so he was clearly spooked about reids quality.

Ottke didn't win all four belts

noone claims he did, dont lie mate.
Start an argument with yourself np, but dont pretend i said that to give your a fictitious "win"
I notice you avoided countering about joe only defending one non-wbo belt JUST ONCE compared to Ottkes FOUR.

He's been voted in the HOF.
Those opinions

its not an opinion hes in HoF, he is in it fact, i told u already. U using my argument AGAINST me? haah.

carry a whole lot more weight than yours. To be honest, your opinions mean absolutely **** all. So like I said, I'm not wasting any more time on you.

you lied agina, you made another post straight after.

[apollocreed]

you just did by making another post. dont lie mate.

plenty say he lost, so its arguable both ways. Reid landed a higher %, he was more accurate and more damaging.

whatever the case, joe went right back to facing a string of bums, so he was clearly spooked about reids quality.

noone claims he did, dont lie mate.
Start an argument with yourself np, but dont pretend i said that to give your a fictitious "win"
I notice you avoided countering about joe only defending one non-wbo belt JUST ONCE compared to Ottkes FOUR.

its not an opinion hes in HoF, he is in it fact, i told u already. U using my argument AGAINST me? haah.


you lied agina, you made another post straight after.

A few big right hands don't win a fight. They didn't visibly hurt Calzaghe, and Calzaghe threw and landed far more punches.

When I said 'opinions', I clearly meant the opinions of the HOF voting panel have a lot more credibility than yours.
It's obviously not an an 'opinion' he's in the HOF.
You either knew what I meant, but were pretending you didn't, or you're just a bit simple.

[DreamFighter]

A few big right hands don't win a fight. They didn't visibly hurt Calzaghe, and Calzaghe threw and landed far more punches.

i agree and reid landed a greater % and did more damage.

When I said 'opinions', I clearly meant the opinions of the HOF voting panel have a lot more credibility than yours.
It's obviously not an an 'opinion' he's in the HOF.
You either knew what I meant, but were pretending you didn't, or you're just a bit simple.

but its my opinion hes deserved in HOF, i agree with them. SO that actually means you AGREE with ME on this.

haha and you are calling me simple for your own mistake!

[apollocreed]

i agree and reid landed a greater % and did more damage.




but its my opinion hes deserved in HOF, i agree with them. SO that actually means you AGREE with ME on this.

haha and you are calling me simple for your own mistake!

Oh my god you really are a sad little ****er.
So you're telling me now that you think Calzaghe should be in the HOF?

And I called you simple because you implied that I was saying it is an opinion that he is in the HOF.
No, I didn't say it is an opinion - it is clearly a fact.
It was voted for by the HOF panel though, so it is due to their opinions, which have a lot more credibility than yours.
Now you're telling me you agree with them though, so you've contradicted yourself quite a lot...

[DreamFighter]

Oh my god you really are a sad little ****er.
So you're telling me now that you think Calzaghe should be in the HOF?

I said that form the beginning. Why am I "sad" for you not noticing what I write form the beginning.

Surely you not reading things is your fault..or do you make a habit of blaming others for your own mistakes?

And I called you simple because you implied that I was saying it is an opinion that he is in the HOF.
No, I didn't say it is an opinion - it is clearly a fact.

i agree its a fact, you should move on.

It was voted for by the HOF panel though, so it is due to their opinions, which have a lot more credibility than yours.

BUT i agree with their opinion hes should be in HOF, thats means you have never had an argument against me on this point.

You can amuse yourself pretending its your winning argument as long as you want to, but its never been an argument with me.

[Marvlus Marv]

groves v froch did 47,000 followed by 355,000 a year later.

I think your'e on with 25,000 - 30ish people want to see Jr. pulled down a peg or two.

Rooting for Degale, then? Lesser of two evils n all that.