Just got done rewatching Thurman vs Garcia and Spence vs Brook. After really analyzing both their skills, I think both would beat Crawford but I think Crawford would have a harder time with Keith. Here's why.
Keith is actually the more skilled fighter than Spence. Spence may have a more consistent jab and ability to cut off the ring but Thurman has the better defense, combinations, movement, athleticism, hand speed, footwork, and ring generalship/boxing IQ. It could also be argued that Thurman hits harder than Spence since both Porter and Bundu have fought/sparred both. Both confirmed that Thurman hits harder. Although Spence and Crawford would be more of a war, I think Thurman and Crawford would be a chess match with a mix of fireworks. I see Crawford vs Thurman being like Casamayor vs Corrales 2. One has more tools than the other but size, speed, and power wins the day. What do you guys think?
Keith is actually the more skilled fighter than Spence. Spence may have a more consistent jab and ability to cut off the ring but Thurman has the better defense, combinations, movement, athleticism, hand speed, footwork, and ring generalship/boxing IQ. It could also be argued that Thurman hits harder than Spence since both Porter and Bundu have fought/sparred both. Both confirmed that Thurman hits harder. Although Spence and Crawford would be more of a war, I think Thurman and Crawford would be a chess match with a mix of fireworks. I see Crawford vs Thurman being like Casamayor vs Corrales 2. One has more tools than the other but size, speed, and power wins the day. What do you guys think?
Comment