Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wow. That is p4p material. Ggg did what charlo, andrade, and lara could not do.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
    When Hopkins fought Joppy, Joppy was coming off a 14 month lay-off.
    When Hopkins fought Hakkar, Hakker was coming off a 10 month lay-off.
    When Hopkins fought Carl Daniels, Daniels was coming off a 13 month lay-off.
    When Hopkins fought Keith Holmes, Holmes was coming off a 12 month lay-off.
    When Hopkins fought Echols (the first fight), Echols was coming off an 11 month lay-off.
    now add 12 more months

    Comment


      #32
      yooo lmaooooo

      Comment


        #33
        goes to show how average they are. the weight and lay off would have nade a difference but not THAT big of a difference. unless people think if he was a bit more active and heavier, he'd have gone from getting ko'd in 2 to 'exposing' golovkin. cause people have said all 3 of the other fighters would have exposed golovkin lol

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
          When Hopkins fought Joppy, Joppy was coming off a 14 month lay-off.
          When Hopkins fought Hakkar, Hakker was coming off a 10 month lay-off.
          When Hopkins fought Carl Daniels, Daniels was coming off a 13 month lay-off.
          When Hopkins fought Keith Holmes, Holmes was coming off a 12 month lay-off.
          When Hopkins fought Echols (the first fight), Echols was coming off an 11 month lay-off.
          Hopkins fans are doing disservice to him. When they start ****ting on GGG using Hopkin's resume, it is no surprise that Hopkin's would also be closely scrutinized but the fact is, most boxers pull some kind of **** that can be criticized without context.

          Comment


            #35
            Troll thread. Why are people feeding into this again?

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
              goes to show how average they are. the weight and lay off would have nade a difference but not THAT big of a difference. unless people think if he was a bit more active and heavier, he'd have gone from getting ko'd in 2 to 'exposing' golovkin. cause people have said all 3 of the other fighters would have exposed golovkin lol
              Vanes is almost 6 1. I cringe when people bring up size into play here. They are almost the same size.

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
                Vanes is almost 6 1. I cringe when people bring up size into play here. They are almost the same size.
                they say hes too small but for years they were saying lara would expose golovkin lol

                Comment


                  #38
                  Well they all fought him when he was ACTIVE and at 154...

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
                    GGG isn't a big mw and he's the same size as vanes. Vanes is 2 inches taller. He just cut a lot of weight.
                    Can GGG make 154?

                    Comment


                      #40
                      it's not about the weight, it's about the inactivity

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP