So we are banking on Hopkins being 39-40 right?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Honestly Jacobs Would Beat Bernard Hopkins like Taylor did twice...
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by boliodogs View PostHopkins was 40 years old when he fought the 27 year old Taylor. That's hardly prime against prime. Age matters even with Hopkins. The forty year old Hopkins was not as good as the Hopkins who beat Trinidad. I thought Hopkins won both Taylor fights anyway and that was Taylor at his best.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeadShots View PostGolovkin was 35 when he beat Jacobs.Last edited by Larry the boss; 05-02-2018, 10:15 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by larryxxx.. View PostAnd Tito while moving up had done more at 160 then Jacobs.......He won a REAL world title
Which win did Joppy have that's better than the undefeated Kid Chocolate? I'll wait.Last edited by HeadShots; 05-02-2018, 10:21 PM.
Comment
-
Jacobs is 31. This 32 year old Hopkins beats Jacobs like a drum:
You match Hopkins vs Jacobs or GGG at the same age and they get their head whooped.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeadShots View Postagainst Joppy. Who would get obliterated by the likes of Kid Chocolate, also an undefeated champ who Jacobs knocked out in 1 round.
Which win did Joppy have that's better than the undefeated Kid Chocolate? I'll wait.
Comment
-
Comment