Originally posted by HeadShots
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I think a lot of people owe Canelo an apology
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostWith his hair sample has come up negative it's clear that he wasn't doping or using clen as a masking agent for something worse.
The results are consistent with eating tainted meat.
The critics should now clear his name with the same publicity with which they besmirched it.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostIf Pacquiao had PED's in his shakes, then that would mean Alex Ariza was purposely aiding him in cheating, whether it was known or not by Pac. It's his responsibility to know what is in the shakes.
No one is arguing that Canelo is innocent of having a banned substance in his system. We know that he did. What's being discussed is whether it was negligence or done with nefarious intent.
The difference is Pacquiao would be guilty of having someone on his team attempting to illegally improve his performance, whereas Canelo would only be guilty of eating meat, with neither he nor his team attempting to illegally improve his performance. That is a big difference.
Furthermore, whatever would be in those shakes would be there to improve performance, whereas Canelo's ingestion of tainted meat would give no benefit as per experts when discussing the amount in his system.
Comment
-
Originally posted by N!Ck F. View PostHe failed 2 tests in February. It does not matter if he tests clean 2 months later. He tested positive twice.
**** HERCULES
ratCatcherMpls
The punishment for accidentally ingesting PED's should be ten times harsher than doing it on purpose because it means you're ****ing ******ed and can't be trusted with simple tasks like eating food and taking medicine//www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/23328867/saul-canelo-alvarez-had-hair-follicle-testing-request-nevada-state-athletic-commission ?br />
lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gigantes View PostOk so if Pacquaio went to Mexico and ate a taco with bad meat and got popped for a banned substance, would the tone still be the same?
But you'd have to ask yourself some obvious questions. Why the fvvck would Pacquiao be in Mexico vacationing right before a fight?Last edited by travestyny; 04-28-2018, 11:22 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostI imagine so. Look at your poll.
But you'd have to ask yourself some obvious questions. Why the fvvck would Pacquiao be in Mexico vacationing right before a fight?
Maybe he's fighting in Mexico lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gigantes View PostI highly doubt these people "excusing" clenelo would treat Pacquiao the same way.
Maybe he's fighting in Mexico lol
Canelo never refused testing and there weren't really any vocal su****ions about him on a grand scale.
But again, as you can see with your poll, most people believe Canelo was cheating anyway. I imagine it would be the same, actually on an even bigger scale with Pacquiao because of his history.
Comment
Comment