I'm talking actual belts which one is the most prestigious?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Which belt is most prestigious in boxing
Collapse
-
Some say x y or z. Realistically for me all four (IBF, WBA, WBC and WBO) now hold the same credibility. The IBO remains behind.
You never see anyone for instance drop x belt to challenge for y because it means more, it would only be based on opponent etc now. That says to me they are all even.
Those who disagree generally are either bias towards one fighter (a number of wilder fans eg “wba wbc ibf” guy claim WBC because they support their guy) and others may claim the WBO means less to them because historically it has. This has some basis behind it but again, I think overtime this is no longer the case.
-
none of them. cant say i ever really take note of whos got which belt, cant say i ever think 'oh wow, that fighters the ibf champ, he must be the best of the lot'. in fact dont really take note of belts full stop, best fighter in the division is based on resume imo, not belts which lets face it a lot of the time are acquired easily.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phenom View PostShould've put the Ring as an option
Comment
-
I got all 4 on equal level now. But the WBC be bull****ting the most.
That IBF belt look fly as fucc though when you pass by the merch table at fights.
Comment
-
Comment