Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can someone explain to aboutfkntime

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
    So if Canelo fought 10 fights at a catchweight of 159.5lbs in your eyes he would not be a middleweight but a junior middleweight 5.5lbs over the limit.

    nobody said that, professor.....

    in addition to preparing to weigh-in at 160, in order to face a middleweight opponent..... a fighter would have to be conditioned to making the weight in order to be considered a genuine middleweight.....
    why do the people who think they are the smartest, open their mouths and prove the opposite?

    no, wait..... I forgot, you don't do so well with questions

    Comment


      Originally posted by Shape up View Post

      here is a link to fishnets saying 160 is not an issue, you really are being shown to be a canelo arse licker
      Originally posted by Shape up View Post

      here is the link to canelo saying it as well, that is straight from the horses mouth knobjockey, you really are an idiot, so now the link to canelo saying 160 is not a problem and the link to fishnets saying 160 wasn't a problem, as I said earlier ggg offered rosado a CW and took a lot of heat for it in the media, so he has never offered one since
      Here is the 2 links again educate yourself liar

      Comment


        Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Post
        He is right


        155 isn’t middleweight.


        155 is caneloweight

        exactly

        Comment


          Originally posted by D4thincarnation View Post
          Kell Brook jump two weights with no intermediary fights. But he also lacked the physique of a middleweight. That was GGG POV


          Kell Brook was a cheeseburger-powered welter, professor

          a welter who needed to move up to 154

          he lacked the physique of a middleweight because he was not conditioned to the weight

          that point, is sooooo plainly obvious, and has been mentioned on numerous occasions..... including to you, just a few minutes ago

          in addition to preparing to weigh-in at 160, in order to face a middleweight opponent..... a fighter would have to be conditioned to making the weight in order to be considered a genuine middleweight.....
          why..... are you here ?

          Comment


            Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
            1) YOU are saying that Brook is a MW because he weighed 159

            2) I am asking you to answer the following question.....



            stop ducking the question, golovb1tch
            No, you fuçking ******. I'm saying that Canelo, the guy who fought at MW and won a belt at MW, defended a belt at MW is a MW. You're the ******ed mother fuçker bringing up Kell Brook.

            Quit making excuses you ***wit Muppet

            Comment


              Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
              Cutting and pasting an old response won't get it done junior.

              why is it old, and unanswered, junior ?



              1) why were you unaware that Canelo weighed 150 at welter?

              2) why were you unaware that Canelo won the WBO jmw title AT 154 by beating Liam Smith about a year ago?

              3) why were you unaware that Reynoso has explained exactly why they are weight-diva's on MULTIPLE occasions?

              4) the most important question..... if you were unaware of those RELEVANT facts, then why are you here running your ****-warmer??????

              5) why can you not answer a simple question.....

              Comment


                Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                Kell Brook was a cheeseburger-powered welter, professor

                a welter who needed to move up to 154

                he lacked the physique of a middleweight because he was not conditioned to the weight

                that point, is sooooo plainly obvious, and has been mentioned on numerous occasions..... including to you, just a few minutes ago



                why..... are you here ?
                Other than on your ****** fuçking head, where on earth is this definition found?

                That will answer why the true Scotsman fallacy applies here

                Comment


                  Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                  No, you fuçking ******. I'm saying that Canelo, the guy who fought at MW and won a belt at MW, defended a belt at MW is a MW. You're the ******ed mother fuçker bringing up Kell Brook.

                  Quit making excuses you ***wit Muppet

                  Canelo did NONE of those things, you ***wit..... he won the title at CATCH-WEIGHT

                  he won it at catchweight, against a guy who weighed 153

                  did I remember to call you a ***wit ?

                  oh, I did..... right

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                    Other than on your ****** fuçking head, where on earth is this definition found?

                    That will answer why the true Scotsman fallacy applies here

                    in the realm of obvious, in the common-sense constellation

                    you are a dip**** for telling me that Canelo should defend his title where he won it..... not realizing that was at 155

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      Canelo did NONE of those things, you ***wit..... he won the title at CATCH-WEIGHT

                      he won it at catchweight, against a guy who weighed 153

                      did I remember to call you a ***wit ?

                      oh, I did..... right
                      He was the middleweight champion you fuçking ******

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP