<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can someone explain to aboutfkntime

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by AKAcronym View Post
    I can't believe people are still talking to this dip****.

    it is fun winding him up and watching him squirm

    try it

    Comment


      Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
      Please act like you have a brain in your head..
      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
      nope

      Comment


        Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
        Is there scientific data to indicate difference in functionality, or are we to operate off of assumption, speculation, and conjecture? Regardless the aesthetic difference, the governing bodies have decided that there is to be a line between the two weights, and that the two weights are in different divisions.


        YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A CLUE, YOU FKN MORON


        this is page 141 loooool

        Comment


          what " functional " difference would .2 lbs make to a fighters performance?

          Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
          Is there scientific data to indicate difference in functionality, or are we to operate off of assumption, speculation, and conjecture?


          Comment


            muppet, where you at..... ?

            are you running around looking for " scientific data "..... to explain what functional difference .2 lbs would make to a fighters performance?


            Comment


              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post

              YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO HAVE A CLUE, YOU FKN MORON


              this is page 141 loooool
              Im supposed to have a clue about a question you asked? You haven't supported anything you've said in this 141 page thread

              Comment


                does .2 lbs weigh more than a calculator ?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View Post
                  Im supposed to have a clue about a question you asked? You haven't supported anything you've said in this 141 page thread

                  I have supplied TONNES of links/vids/knowledge..... oh, and a LOT of common-sense as well

                  should I have also supplied..... " scientific data " ?


                  Comment


                    bored now

                    thanks gloveking

                    laterz

                    Comment


                      the fact that this thread is 142 pages in and still hasn't got past the argument from page 1 is almost as sad as aboutf@ggettime being a washed up middle aged man who conducts himself like an adolescent on the internet.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP