[22 FOULS] This is Why Rigondeaux Quit

[McNulty]

Half of those were the side of the head.

Behind the ear is considered rabbit punching, learn the sport.

[McNulty]

Where are all the GIF's with Rigo holding for proper context and objectivity???

Because most of them happened right after these gifs. Making these took a long time and if you read the title of the thread, Rigondeaux holding isn't why he quit....it's called context. Google it.

[boxingenius002]

nope your just dumb and never boxed nor no **** about boxing, good day sir.

[richardt]

Because most of them happened right after these gifs. Making these took a long time and if you read the title of the thread, Rigondeaux holding isn't why he quit....it's called context. Google it.

You should put ALL fouls up from both - that is what is called a uniform context; an actual balance of what took place, not just part of a bigger picture. Having said that, I wish Lom would have taken a different approach because he didnt need to rat-a-tat-tat like that and could have refrained. What he didnt use was 100% full force on those punches. Those were taps, not power punches with vicious nature, or Rigo would have crashed to the canvas or quickly pulled back from them. The punches were meant to be annoying to the guy bending down, nothing more.

[Bjl12]

A lot of the fouls happen from Rigo bending. That makes the foul incidental.

[boxinggod101]

[Bjl12]

Well every time Loma is mentioned there's usually a 'Salido Doe', and i just find it odd that you haven't done one for that fight.

Anyway, isn't it illegal to also bend below the waist?

Stop getting upset with trolls.

Loma dominated and win every round without question. I think 1 judge gave 1st to Rigo. Even so that's 17-1 on scorecards.

There were no fouls. Masterclass performance by Loma.

Trolls gonna troll so let em troll

[McNulty]

A lot of the fouls happen from Rigo bending. That makes the foul incidental.

It's not incidental. You're misinterpreting the rule. Thats for punches already in motion. Also, thats for someone bending low with their face facing the ground. Rigonndeaux's head was mostly looking up which is the complete.

If Rigondeaux was doing something illegal with bending why didn't the ref warn him? Bending to an angle that forces you to face the ground or putting your back to another fighter because you can't see is the concern. Also, any incidental ruling is for punches already in motion as someone turns away or etc. When someone turns away from the action the ref always steps in to warn the fighter from the fight being stopped.

It's completely illegal for another fighter to intentionally foul another fighter, the end. Y'all are trying to dress it up like Rigondeaux hit Lomachenko in the back of the head and Lomachenko retaliated by hitting Rigondeaux in the back of the head. He fouled so I can foul --- fùck off with that garbage. Completely different.

When Rigondeaux is in a static position, Lomachenko is not allowed to hammer fist the back of Rigondeaux's head. For the same reason he can't bite his fùcking ear off you peasant. You can't foul intentionally. YDKSAB if you think otherwise. This isn't MMA people. Blows to the back of the brain are always and inevitably illegal.

FOUL #5: Back of Head #4 (3x)

FOUL #11: Back of Head #9

FOUL #19: Back of Head #14 (4x)

Those are all intentional fouls. If you think those punches are legal make sure to respond so I can put you on my ignore list because YDKSAB.

[Chaos]

Behind the ear is considered rabbit punching, learn the sport.

They weren't behind the ear, moron, they were the side of the head.

[Lomasexual]

So we have officially found Boxingscene's saltiest bitch.

All hail McSalty, newly crowned queen of salt.