Well dont see you on your knees mouth open for parker we all know its the big money v aj your interested in wait your turn no one besides demands you head the que except you joshua is doing great things for just 20 pro fights better career already than wilders
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wilder: I Don't Think Joshua Has The Motivation To Unify - I Do!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Andre_parker1 View Postwilder can't keep the name joshua off his mouth...and this writer labelling takam a journeyman.. what should Molina,Washington, duhaupas and szpilka be called then..cuz i believe takam grinds them all up
Comment
-
Originally posted by Andrij View PostWilder could be in for a rude awakening tonight if he overlooks Stiverne.
Comment
-
-
I wish AJ would just take this Bumsquad Wilder fight already. Free WBC title and make lots of money and sell out wembley 90k+ easy. Become unified champ and shut all these bumsquad fans up already. What is Hearn and AJ so reluctant to make this fight if everyone thinks Wilder doesnt beat AJ anyway????? Pls explain
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostJoshua has never faced a top 5 fighter. Wilder has faced, and dominated, a top 3 fighter.
Joshua is still young and what he's accomplished is very impressive. He's taking his time, as he should. But you can't lie about the facts and the fact is that Joshua has never faced a top 5 fighter, let alone a top 3 fighter. Wilder has.
Yes, Joshua earns more money. Congratulations. Unless you're getting a cut of it, I'm not sure why you'd care.
Joshua is a huge star. Hearn is protecting his investment. As he should. Wilder is the biggest risk and therefore the guy you face last. This is how this works. Fury is the smallest risk and therefore the guy you face first.
Joshua beat wladimir Klitschko, long reigning king of the division for over a decade before Fury dethroned him.
Wilder beat stiverne LOL.
Klitschko could beat Stiverne with one hand behind his back.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostNothing you've stated contradicts our position. There are criticisms that can be lobbed at any of the titles, but objectively the WBC is still the most prestigious. Joshua's promoter and Wilder's promoter have both stated that publicly many times. Nobody in the industry disputes that the WBC championship is the most desirable.
Stiverne was moved to #5 after losing the title. Those in front of him lost, fought for other titles or retired. As the former champion, with those in front of him losing, fighting for other titles or retiring, Stiverne fighting an eliminator to become the next mandatory was perfectly reasonable. Had Stiverne defeated Povetkin, you wouldn't be complaining about his ranking.
But Povetkin cheated. Not your fault. Not our fault. Not Stiverne's fault. With Wilder's mandatory way overdue, Stiverne lucked into a mandatory. It's not ideal, but the fault is Povetkin's. Stiverne agreed to risk his position against Breazeale in a final eliminator.
But King Kong cheated. Not your fault. Not our fault. Not Breazeale's fault. So Breazeale is facing the leading available contender. It's not ideal, but the fault is King Kong's.
Luckily, Whyte remains the top ranked contender & Breazeale-Molina is NOT a final eliminator, confirmed by the WBC yesterday.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View PostHe can't force the other champions to fight him. If Wilder isn't a great fighter, like so many trolls here claim, why aren't the other champions aggressively pursuing him? The facts don't support your premise.
Wilder's team desperately tried to get Parker in the ring earlier this year, but Bob Arum blocked the fight.
Wilder would like to fight Joshua ASAP, but Joshua doesn't want to fight him until late 2018. Joshua is the A-side, so Wilder will have to wait.
But to question Wilder's desire to unify is ludicrous.
Comment
Comment