I voted for roman wide decision just based on what i heard about the fight being a robbery but i just watched first fight for first time and it wasnt a robbery at all
Had it a draw
[IMG][/IMG]
Hbo propaganda by kellerman was on full display. Calling the decision a shocker when hbos own unofficial judge only had roman winning by a round. He had roman p4p number 1 and wanted to justify that and was biased as a result.
Rung has better stamina, output but little head movement. When he would try and push roman back he would get outboxed in the exchanges. Roman is aging , his legs arent there like they used to be so if rung makes roman lead and uses his footspeed from outside he could get the win.
Worried for the fairness of the scoring given that hbo have put out the false narrative that roman was robbed and judges may be favourable to him this time around
Had it a draw
[IMG][/IMG]
Hbo propaganda by kellerman was on full display. Calling the decision a shocker when hbos own unofficial judge only had roman winning by a round. He had roman p4p number 1 and wanted to justify that and was biased as a result.
Rung has better stamina, output but little head movement. When he would try and push roman back he would get outboxed in the exchanges. Roman is aging , his legs arent there like they used to be so if rung makes roman lead and uses his footspeed from outside he could get the win.
Worried for the fairness of the scoring given that hbo have put out the false narrative that roman was robbed and judges may be favourable to him this time around
Comment