I was thinking the exact same thing
Its not interesting when the commentators are agreeing on everything
Gamboa vs castellenos is a good example of when commentating is interesting because the commentators are debating...it was Hopkins and atlas
Even in horn vs PAC, Bradley was scared to say he thought horn won because of the pressure of Stephen a smith lol and he doesn't wanna disagree with his own trainer..but he should be told its fine and better for viewers to disagree ...Bradley was a come forward mauler like horn in his earlier years so its natural for him to favour that style
Its not interesting when the commentators are agreeing on everything
Gamboa vs castellenos is a good example of when commentating is interesting because the commentators are debating...it was Hopkins and atlas
Even in horn vs PAC, Bradley was scared to say he thought horn won because of the pressure of Stephen a smith lol and he doesn't wanna disagree with his own trainer..but he should be told its fine and better for viewers to disagree ...Bradley was a come forward mauler like horn in his earlier years so its natural for him to favour that style
Comment