Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Video Total Landed Punch counts and Why it's clear Pac Beat Horn

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by The Akbar One View Post
    Yeah the video credited some shots that were short
    them dudes are idiots by doing that they only hurt their case. These type of videos were good ideas in theory if the person who created them can self regulate and keep his agenda to himself and just create the video as non bias as possible but they cant do that so they slip in a few shots ify shots and open the door so their video can be written off just like this one here.

    I will never understand these type of people, so dumb they shoot themselves in the foot and waste their time doing so too.

    Comment


      Originally posted by !WAR CHAVEZ! View Post
      them dudes are idiots by doing that they only hurt their case. These type of videos were good ideas in theory if the person who created them can self regulate and keep his agenda to himself and just create the video as non bias as possible but they cant do that so they slip in a few shots ify shots and open the door so their video can be written off just like this one here.

      I will never understand these type of people, so dumb they shoot themselves in the foot and waste their time doing so too.
      No one said it's a perfect tally. I even said it in the early page. Everyone is entitled to watch the video and have their opinions about it. No one is perfect. There can be mistakes in the video, but remember, the general consensus among boxers and boxing press including Teddy that Pac out landed Horn. Whether there are a few punches that should have been omitted or not. This video can at least give an over view of who was truly connecting more throughout the rounds. No one is perfect. Judges has been proven to be biased, refs can be bought, drug agencies can be bought as well, but your eyes can see if this at least show who was connecting. Scoring is subjective. You have eyes to see who truly won. No one person can have the same number of punch connects. But a grp of people can tell which person landed more in a round. It may differ in landed punches, but the one who landed more will float up.

      If you still see Horn winning this after seeing this video then you are entitled to your opinion, but don't discredit a video for it's lack of integrity just because it shows Pac landed more. Use yours eyes. And even after seeing this video you still consider Horn winning. All it takes is to time stamp it if it didn't land and will score it again. Let's see who deserves the W.

      But to discredit the whole video without seeing the whole essence of it, is like Discrediting Cavez Jr. even before he got massacred by Canelo in the ring and that he should have never fought Canelo in the first place lmao.

      Even if you make a a post fight punch connects of that Cavez Jr. Canelo fight, Even if you try hard enough to fake and padd his score punch connects, the beauty of a video, video doesn't lie, it will always be there to show if it landed. Cavez will never be able to land more than Canelo in that fight coz videos are hard copies of truth, it's just a fact. Just as the professional boxers have seen and spoken that Pac landed the most punches that night. Putting a video out there just adds to the truth that Pac did land more.

      Last edited by Spoon23; 07-07-2017, 12:37 PM.

      Comment


        Add Joel Diaz to the list



        Says Manny won the fight but took Horn for granted. Then says that Manny would stop Horn in a rematch.

        Comment


          The corruption in boxing explained further why It's wrong that Judges are paid the promoters. So much wrong in boxing and a lot of stream lining must be done to eradicate this kind of practice In boxing.


          Boxing.com




          It makes it even more disappointing that such disgraceful decisions still happen so frequently in boxing, since ESPN saw fantastic television ratings for the Pacquiao-Horn bout. Instead of a great night for the sport, increasing the television viewership with a big name star like Manny Pacquaio in a fun, action-filled fight, those new or returning viewers were shown why they can’t take boxing seriously. How emotionally invested will most people become in a sport that frequently robs and disrespects its own athletes?

          The only way this sort of disgraceful judging will change is if the sport changes the way judges are compensated. Currently, they are paid directly by the promoters of a fight, rather than by the athletic commissions. It’s an obvious conflict of interest, and is the primary reason it’s easy to wonder about corruption when a dubious or downright bad decision is turned in.


          In addition, a critical eye needs to be turned to professional boxing judges’ ability to mentally perform at such a high level. It takes a lot of focus and intensity to properly score rounds in a fight, and we have seen many cases in recent years where the judges involved in poor scoring became confused either about which fighter was which (as in the recent Burnett-Haskins fight in the UK) or just confused in general (as in the Tony Thompson-Luis Ortiz bout in March 2016). It seems that many sanctioning bodies and athletic commissions aren’t taking the jobs that judges perform as seriously as they should.
          Last edited by Spoon23; 07-07-2017, 11:05 PM.

          Comment


            Add Robert Garcia and Abner Mares to the list. Both had Pacquiao. I guess Teddy swayed them too.



            Comment


              Originally posted by Mike D View Post
              Add Robert Garcia and Abner Mares to the list. Both had Pacquiao. I guess Teddy swayed them too.



              Already did. Thanks. 👍

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP