Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

John David Jackson: "Gennady Golovkins biggest flaw is his defense, he has no defense

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    John David Jackson: "Gennady Golovkins biggest flaw is his defense, he has no defense

    #2
    After the Golovkin fans have been going hard willing to back this traitor too. How can he do them like that?

    Comment

      #3
      Golovkin had no defense when he faced boxers who can't hit hard.

      Golovkin showed amazing defensive skills when he fought hard-punching Lemieux.

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
        After the Golovkin fans have been going hard willing to back this traitor too. How can he do them like that?
        Whining pu55y
        Why you put me on in ignore in your gay thread? Kinda defeats the purpose when i can still respond to you.

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by Solntse View Post
          Golovkin had no defense when he faced boxers who can't hit hard.

          Golovkin showed amazing defensive skills when he fought hard-punching Lemieux.
          He didn't need much defense in that fight. He boxed Lemieux. Lemieux was never a threat because he couldn't hold off GGG's offense.

          Comment

            #6
            If he had no defense he would've gotten KOed by now or at the very least have a bunch of losses.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
              Why didn't Jacobs knock him out then? or hurt him?

              Why no one could hurt him or knock him down? inb4 posts a gif of brook landing an uppercut.

              Simple, he trusts his chin too much sometimes, but he has good defense. It might not be perfect but it's good, that's why he's a p4p fighter.

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View Post
                He didn't need much defense in that fight. He boxed Lemieux. Lemieux was never a threat because he couldn't hold off GGG's offense.
                Lemieux sucks, that's why lol. Why do you think some people here pretend he was some A level fighter? I think it's hilarious though. START JUMPIN' ON JDJ GOLOVKIN/KOVALEV FANS! Lmao!!!

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by TheCell8 View Post
                  If he had no defense he would've gotten KOed by now or at the very least have a bunch of losses.
                  Exactly. This is what I'm saying. But the obvious is not obvious to the hater.

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                    Why didn't Jacobs knock him out then? or hurt him?

                    Why no one could hurt him or knock him down? inb4 posts a gif of brook landing an uppercut.

                    Simple, he trusts his chin too much sometimes, but he has good defense. It might not be perfect but it's good, that's why he's a p4p fighter.
                    Having a good chin isn't the same as having a good defence.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP