Originally posted by larryxxx.
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Floyd Mayweather who destroyed Gatti vs current Terrance Crawford?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostLol you and your imbecile triangle theorys, how the fck do you have any theory when right of the mark you got no idea what you are looking at when watching boxing, your opinion on boxing is worthless to anybody interested in the sport.
crawford can also fight going forward and backwards unlike canelo so he can bring that straight left to floyd if need be. canelo could not bring his counter punching style to floyd because floyd knew how to roll his shots. maybe floyd could win but if you pretend floyds name is lloyd bayweather you would probably see it a lot more clear cause right now your fan goggles are clouding your judgement. floyd didnt fight guys like crawford for a reason. just look how floyd acted when stevie johnstons name was brought up as an opponent....and now hes dominating crawford? if floyd was so worried about losing why arent you? maybe cause you have nothing on the line. real know realLast edited by daggum; 06-12-2017, 11:41 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by daggum View Postfloyd who looked great vs a human punch bag....ok and how bad did floyd look vs corley getting rocked and hit cleanly over and over? please show me when floyd fought someone like crawford.....crickets. crawford has fought "slick" guys and fast guys many times. he also has the southpaw stance that floyd has trouble avoiding. hes also bigger and has more power. floyd would never take the fight so we will never know
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View PostHe thinks Crawford is N'dou or soemthing.
I think TC would have nightmares with Floyds movement and foot speed, I think TC would look clumsy at times against Floyd. But TC hasn't reached his peak either so its not really fair.
The people saying well Corley clocked him or Mosley rocked him, or Gamboa had TC gone, in terms of TC vs FM is just another take on the good ol triangle theory.
This resume sht don't matter when the real top liners are in their biggest fights, because they rise to the occasion, the greats are at their most vulnerable when fighting the top guys that are not super fight material.
They still beat them though they can have moments, every ATG throughout history had losses or shaky moments against not so great fighters.
If one understands how hard it is to be consistent at top level, then one will understand they need something great to stimulate their mind into their very best zone, that's why greats rise to the occasion and always win those really big fights, not blowing out or dominating every single opponent through a resume doesn't mean anything, its just fan BS.
Be like saying if Horn does better than expected he must be extra good or Manny was a hype job, if any body thinks Manny will be in the shape he was in against Floyd they are nuts, so that makes Manny vulnerable for a poor showing. The haters will use it to sht can Manny the lovers will turn Horn into the next coming.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostIm sure others are thinking Floyd must be a little better Gamboa so it goes both ways on that one.
I think TC would have nightmares with Floyds movement and foot speed, I think TC would look clumsy at times against Floyd. But TC hasn't reached his peak either so its not really fair.
The people saying well Corley clocked him or Mosley rocked him, or Gamboa had TC gone, in terms of TC vs FM is just another take on the good ol triangle theory.
This resume sht don't matter when the real top liners are in their biggest fights, because they rise to the occasion, the greats are at their most vulnerable when fighting the top guys that are not super fight material.
They still beat them though they can have moments, every ATG throughout history had losses or shaky moments against not so great fighters.
If one understands how hard it is to be consistent at top level, then one will understand they need something great to stimulate their mind into their very best zone, that's why greats rise to the occasion and always win those really big fights, not blowing out or dominating every single opponent through a resume doesn't mean anything, its just fan BS.
Be like saying if Horn does better than expected he must be extra good or Manny was a hype job, if any body thinks Manny will be in the shape he was in against Floyd they are nuts, so that makes Manny vulnerable for a poor showing. The haters will use it to sht can Manny the lovers will turn Horn into the next coming.
Also, if you're a Floyd fan, you must know by now that Floyd is in 100% shape, physically, and mentally for every single one of his fights. He also trains for every fight like it's his last. That's part of his greatness. So, that doesn't apply to Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dosumpthin View PostYou ****** ****t@rd.
The thread title clearly states FLOYD THAT DESTROYED GATTI. Not floyd who faced whomever the **** you feel like it.
You chose lesser performances so I will choose ****ty performances by crawford. Idiot.
Go watch floyd vs gatti. A masterpiece.
Then go watch crawford get rocked silly by no fundamental tired lowest ring IQ in history gamboa.
Then watch get hit clean by slow sorry ass postol.
By the way. You must be poosie to make empty threats to strangers on the internet. ***git.
after seeing this photo its clear crawford ko's floyd in 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Reloaded View PostIm sure others are thinking Floyd must be a little better Gamboa so it goes both ways on that one.
I think TC would have nightmares with Floyds movement and foot speed, I think TC would look clumsy at times against Floyd. But TC hasn't reached his peak either so its not really fair.
The people saying well Corley clocked him or Mosley rocked him, or Gamboa had TC gone, in terms of TC vs FM is just another take on the good ol triangle theory.
This resume sht don't matter when the real top liners are in their biggest fights, because they rise to the occasion, the greats are at their most vulnerable when fighting the top guys that are not super fight material.
They still beat them though they can have moments, every ATG throughout history had losses or shaky moments against not so great fighters.
If one understands how hard it is to be consistent at top level, then one will understand they need something great to stimulate their mind into their very best zone, that's why greats rise to the occasion and always win those really big fights, not blowing out or dominating every single opponent through a resume doesn't mean anything, its just fan BS.
Be like saying if Horn does better than expected he must be extra good or Manny was a hype job, if any body thinks Manny will be in the shape he was in against Floyd they are nuts, so that makes Manny vulnerable for a poor showing. The haters will use it to sht can Manny the lovers will turn Horn into the next coming.
it would be an interesting fight but unfortunatley it would never happen as floyd was too scared to face stevie johnston and hbo benched him for doing so, therefore i see no reason he would take the crawford challenge. the slicksters were just not for floyd. he liked the slow face first guys
Comment
-
Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View PostI get what you're saying, but TC's chin, mental strength, and skills are way too good for Floyd to finish him. Floyd's been the distance with far worse fighters than TC, and correct me if I'm wrong, but TC hasn't even been dropped yet.
Also, if you're a Floyd fan, you must know by now that Floyd is in 100% shape, physically, and mentally for every single one of his fights. He also trains for every fight like it's his last. That's part of his greatness. So, that doesn't apply to Floyd.
TC gets hit a fair bit and makes mistakes I like him a lot he has huge potential just wanna see him fight a few of the elite guys to see his full toolbox, we haven't seen the best of TC just yet.
Comment
Comment