Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here we go again......

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    PBF34, you know that compubox isn't 100% accurate, right? second, the harder punches matter more in my opinion which clearly favored collazo.

    Comment


      #12
      It was a very close fight, and a draw was acceptable, to go back after the fact is bull****. In my eyes i dont see Hatton winning the fight, i dont see him being effective, but he got the decision. Now if they had gone back and rearanged the score cards and called it a lose, I'd have been pissed for Hatton. Judges aren't gods, and they can be swayed by their opinion, wether they want to give a great champ another win in the twilight of his career, or not let an undefeated young star get his first loss to someone who no one has ever heard of before, In the end you gotta do it in the ring with your fists, and make your win unmistakable.

      Comment


        #13
        When compubox numbers are very close in fights as was the case in the Hatton / Collazo fight, it goes on who lands the more effective punches, at least how I would score it.

        Comment


          #14
          Boxing reflects life: sometimes (even often for some) it isn't fair.

          Also, a few times the unfairness is that which is merely perceived as such.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by j
            PBF34, you know that compubox isn't 100% accurate, right? second, the harder punches matter more in my opinion which clearly favored collazo.
            yes, i know.
            i was at the fight, and the feeling there was that Hatton was the winner. He landed more blows and controlled the pace.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by deliveryman
              When compubox numbers are very close in fights as was the case in the Hatton / Collazo fight, it goes on who lands the more effective punches, at least how I would score it.
              you score a fight round by round, not by what happens overall.

              Hatton won the majority of the rounds.
              Its quite simple, actully.

              Comment


                #17
                Like Diegofuego said, if any of the people could produce a scorecard saying how Collazo was robbed, we'd at least have been able to properly debate it.

                I actually had Collazo winning by 1 point (7-5 with the KD), but I scored every close round in Collazos favour. Hatton won at least 5 rounds clearly, so to cry robbery simply doesn't fit wih the way the fight actually went.

                Comment


                  #18
                  I disagree with 1 but I agree with 2. Hatton won that fight IMO over Collazo. I wanted to score the 2nd fight for Juarez but honestly the decision should have went to Barrera(and it did).

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by johnny swift
                    Like I said the popularity of boxing is dying because of the bull**** judging that goes on. Two recent atrocities.

                    1) Ricky Hatton gets gift decision
                    2) Marco Antonio Barrera gets a decision after fight is ruled a draw in the ring, the judges go back and award the fight to Barrera in the locker room.


                    My boxing love just went down to a 4
                    That's the way it has always been in boxing though. I sometimes still get all wound up, thinking about a decision in the past that didn't go the way I thought it should have. Although, to think about the close fights that did go the way that I thought they should ... ahh

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Enough with this ****. Hatton won, Lederman scored it appropiately. Didnt see the Barrera fight.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP