Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IV rehydration ban - how do you feel about it, and how do they enforce it?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
    DEFLECTOR!

    You were OK with a tweet that had nothing to do with May 1st, 2015 and YOU called that PROOF!

    So if yours is PROOF then mine is what?


    Now Floyd stating that this is according to you nothing
    even though it was also followed up with a video of Floyd saying that he did bet on the game.


    b) Here you go! REAL PROOF!!!
    ""Hey, I got to go to sportsbook and gotta bet on the game""
    Once again:

    1. Does that make it clear WHEN he went. Do you think they allowed him to go bet instead of give his sample.

    2. In the other video, he mentioned he also ate. Did he go out to a restaurant or home? Is your argument that they also let him go out to eat before giving the sample?

    3. Post the other video where he says he ate and bet on a game, and clearly mimicked texting when he said he bet on the game.

    You don't have any proof of anything. You are obsessed and it's really sad. Once again, move on with your life.

    Comment


      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
      Once again:

      1. Does that make it clear WHEN he went. Do you think they allowed him to go bet instead of give his sample.

      2. In the other video, he mentioned he also ate. Did he go out to a restaurant or home? Is your argument that they also let him go out to eat before giving the sample?

      3. Post the other video where he says he ate and bet on a game, and clearly mimicked texting when he said he bet on the game.

      You don't have any proof of anything. You are obsessed and it's really sad. Once again, move on with your life.
      You are still the man that they call THE DEFLECTOR!!!!

      You were the one that had PROOF. Now that I came back with real proof, oh, that is not good enough.


      Floyd ate and drank with no problem! So Floyd was able to eat and drink with no problem. According to the head of WADA TUE Committee that is enough to say that Floyd should NOT have been allowed to get a RETRO TUE!!!!

      Also, if Floyd was so severely dehydrated, how come he was laughing it up as YOU even admitted and looked good? Drank? YUP!!!


      b) Here you go! REAL PROOF!!!
      ""Hey, I got to go to sportsbook and gotta bet on the game""









      Here is Floyd after getting the IV talking about being drained is a disadvantage for others not him. You can't make this SH$T UP!!!
      I'm not one particular fighter that has drained himself 20 or 30 pounds. I'm a fighter that walks around at 150, 148...I'm extremely happy with everything...right now, my house is real, real peaceful and that's the way I like it," stated undefeated pound-for-pound king Floyd Mayweather, who invited FightHype.com into his home less than 24 hours before he steps into the ring to face Manny Pacquiao


      below video he mentions that he bet on the game:

      Comment


        Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        You are still the man that they call THE DEFLECTOR!!!!

        You were the one that had PROOF. Now that I came back with real proof, oh, that is not good enough.


        Floyd ate and drank with no problem! So Floyd was able to eat and drink with no problem. According to the head of WADA TUE Committee that is enough to say that Floyd should NOT have been allowed to get a RETRO TUE!!!!

        Also, if Floyd was so severely dehydrated, how come he was laughing it up as YOU even admitted and looked good? Drank? YUP!!!


        b) Here you go! REAL PROOF!!!
        ""Hey, I got to go to sportsbook and gotta bet on the game""









        Here is Floyd after getting the IV talking about being drained is a disadvantage for others not him. You can't make this SH$T UP!!!
        I'm not one particular fighter that has drained himself 20 or 30 pounds. I'm a fighter that walks around at 150, 148...I'm extremely happy with everything...right now, my house is real, real peaceful and that's the way I like it," stated undefeated pound-for-pound king Floyd Mayweather, who invited FightHype.com into his home less than 24 hours before he steps into the ring to face Manny Pacquiao


        below video he mentions that he bet on the game:

        Still going?

        1. You are deflecting from WHEN he went....IF he even went. You have any proof he went before giving his sample. Post it up. You have any proof that he went??? Post it up. Do you even know what it's like to go to sports book? People go there to bet and watch the games, which is why it caused a big laugh when he said it. You take that, which is your habit of making everything into hyperbole, and stay he didn't go home...yet you post a video of him in his home, saying he ate, bet on basketball (while motioning like he sent some text messages) and then saying he slept for 4 hours. And you think you have proof??????

        2. You are reaching. The WADA guy never said he shouldn't have had the TUE. SO STOP TELLING LIES. The WADA guy said he wasn't aware of his case.

        3. Once again, and hopefully for the last time, the independent TUEC approved of the application. THE APPLICATION WAS THEN SENT TO WADA. IF WADA HAD A PROBLEM WITH IT, IT WAS THEIR JOB TO REVERSE IT. THEY DIDN'T. STOP BLAMING USADA WHEN EITHER WADA APPROVED OR DIDNT DO THEIR JOB.

        4. You have nothing. So shut up. Thanks.
        Last edited by travestyny; 03-21-2017, 08:14 AM.

        Comment


          Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          You are still the man that they call THE DEFLECTOR!!!!

          You were the one that had PROOF. Now that I came back with real proof, oh, that is not good enough.


          Floyd ate and drank with no problem! So Floyd was able to eat and drink with no problem. According to the head of WADA TUE Committee that is enough to say that Floyd should NOT have been allowed to get a RETRO TUE!!!!

          Also, if Floyd was so severely dehydrated, how come he was laughing it up as YOU even admitted and looked good? Drank? YUP!!!


          b) Here you go! REAL PROOF!!!
          ""Hey, I got to go to sportsbook and gotta bet on the game""









          Here is Floyd after getting the IV talking about being drained is a disadvantage for others not him. You can't make this SH$T UP!!!
          I'm not one particular fighter that has drained himself 20 or 30 pounds. I'm a fighter that walks around at 150, 148...I'm extremely happy with everything...right now, my house is real, real peaceful and that's the way I like it," stated undefeated pound-for-pound king Floyd Mayweather, who invited FightHype.com into his home less than 24 hours before he steps into the ring to face Manny Pacquiao


          below video he mentions that he bet on the game:

          Why don't you take the time to admit that you are wrong about EPO being a threshold substance. Come on little guy, you can do it. I been waiting.

          Here... gonna post this once again because it ends your dumb theory. You lost.

          Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          The results needs to meet a certain level of certainty (threshold) or else its considered a negative.

          Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          Threshold means that it needs to meet a given criteria ... whatever it is.
          Look at you squirming and trying to change what is meant by threshold. LMAOOOO. So what�s the threshold for EPO? Go find it.

          That is NOT what threshold means. WADA clearly states what a threshold substance is.

          Threshold Substance: An exogenous or endogenous Prohibited Substance, Metabolite or Marker of a Prohibited Substance which is analyzed quantitatively and for which an analytical result (concentration, ratio or score) in excess of a pre-determined Decision Limit constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding. Threshold Substances are identified as such in the Technical Document on Decision Limits (TD DL).


          Once again, here is the list of Threshold Substances:

          [IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-08%20at%209.33.10%20AM.png[/IMG]

          But you knew that didn�t you? Yea, you did. You said it must be a partial list because EPO wasn�t there. So that shows that you believed EPO was a threshold substance, didn�t you? Didn�t you???? Don�t try to back out now. Oh�I have the quote right here:

          Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
          I didn't even see EPO on the list so it must be a partial list. Anyways, Floyd micro-doses then time is of essence if you want to catch the substance above the threshold. Then add to it that Floyd drank like a fish and had not 1 but 2 IVs ....other cheats wished they were allowed to do what Floyd was allowed on May 1st, 2015

          LMAOOOO. Admit you are wronggggg!!!!

          It�s not about a threshold, idiot. They analyze the bands to determine if it is positive for EPO.

          rEPOs and analogues can be distinguished from endogenous EPO (uEPO, bEPO) based on their characteristic band shape and different apparent molecular mass. The migration behaviour (band) of each rEPO or analogue, i.e. position and shape (width, focused or more diffused) can be used to confirm the identity and/or exogenous origin of the substance.
          Waiting for you to admit you are wrong. Your whole theory goes down the drain!!!!

          Comment


            Originally posted by travestyny View Post
            Why don't you take the time to admit that you are wrong about EPO being a threshold substance. Come on little guy, you can do it. I been waiting.

            Here... gonna post this once again because it ends your dumb theory. You lost.






            Look at you squirming and trying to change what is meant by threshold. LMAOOOO. So what�s the threshold for EPO? Go find it.

            That is NOT what threshold means. WADA clearly states what a threshold substance is.

            Threshold Substance: An exogenous or endogenous Prohibited Substance, Metabolite or Marker of a Prohibited Substance which is analyzed quantitatively and for which an analytical result (concentration, ratio or score) in excess of a pre-determined Decision Limit constitutes an Adverse Analytical Finding. Threshold Substances are identified as such in the Technical Document on Decision Limits (TD DL).


            Once again, here is the list of Threshold Substances:

            [IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-08%20at%209.33.10%20AM.png[/IMG]

            But you knew that didn�t you? Yea, you did. You said it must be a partial list because EPO wasn�t there. So that shows that you believed EPO was a threshold substance, didn�t you? Didn�t you???? Don�t try to back out now. Oh�I have the quote right here:




            LMAOOOO. Admit you are wronggggg!!!!

            It�s not about a threshold, idiot. They analyze the bands to determine if it is positive for EPO.



            Waiting for you to admit you are wrong. Your whole theory goes down the drain!!!!
            TRAVESTYNY
            HGH is technically considered a threshold substance, but it is not tested in the way that these are tested. There is a biological marker that is used, and also tests to differentiate the naturally occurring chemical to that which is injected.

            Were you not stating similarly for HGH which was not on the list but you said its checking "differentiate the naturally occurring chemical to that which is injected"

            I explained/clarified it for you.

            You just hate that I caught the DEFLECTOR AGAIN and AGAIN DEFLECTING.

            I'm still waiting for you to state that you are wrong the other day.


            BTW - Squirming? I also responded to you in another thread .... I do NOT DEFLECT .... YOU DO!!!
            Last edited by ADP02; 03-21-2017, 08:08 AM.

            Comment


              Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              Were you not stating similarly for HGH which was not on the list but you said its checking "differentiate the naturally occurring chemical to that which is injected"

              I explained/clarified it for you.
              What? What is your point? You didn't clarify anything for me. How can you clarify something when you were WRONG! You are still pretending that you actually know something about all of this shlt, when the truth is you know NOTHING about this shlt. Absolutely nothing. Stop embarrassing yourself. Stick to your damn day job.

              Deflecting to HGH isn't going to help you. I can back up everything I say with FACTS! HGH IS specifically mentioned in the document on threshold substances. It IS mentioned as a threshold substance in the document. It's just tested in a different way. As I stated before and as WADA stated, ALL OF THE THRESHOLD SUBSTANCES ARE MENTIONED IN THE TDDL DOCUMENT. EPO IS NOT THERE! I'm giving you FACTS! You, on the other hand, give false quotations (say you didn't!) and find bullshlt information from anywhere just scouring the net. You tried to pass some threshold for EPO from some dude on a cycling forum. You're a joke!


              Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              You just hate that I caught the DEFLECTOR AGAIN and AGAIN DEFLECTING.

              I'm still waiting for you to state that you are wrong the other day.
              What exactly do you want to pretend that I was wrong about? I'm still waiting for YOU to confirm that YOU were wrong. You said it was a partial list, right? Right?????? You said it was a partial list because EPO wasn't on it. Right???


              SO...is it a partial list? Yes or no. I bet you duck this question. You won't answer it will you. I DARE YOU.

              Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
              BTW - Squirming? I also responded to you in another thread .... I do NOT DEFLECT .... YOU DO!!!

              Bullshlt. All you do is DEFLECT and DUCK, and then claim someone else is doing it. YOu're a straight up coward and you know you are. Did you admit that you were wrong yet? You been trying to change the definition for threshold for how long now? It's not going to work. You got caught out there and your conspiracy theory went down the drain!
              Last edited by travestyny; 03-21-2017, 10:25 AM.

              Comment


                Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                I didn't even see EPO on the list so it must be a partial list. Anyways, Floyd micro-doses then time is of essence if you want to catch the substance above the threshold. Then add to it that Floyd drank like a fish and had not 1 but 2 IVs ....other cheats wished they were allowed to do what Floyd was allowed on May 1st, 2015

                [IMG]http://i62.***********.com/albums/h95/travestyny/Screen%20Shot%202017-03-08%20at%209.33.10%20AM.png[/IMG]

                Question: Is EPO a threshold substance, as you stated? yes or no?


                Very simple. Let's watch you duck and deflect. LMAOOOOOO. I'm going to be laughing when you do, homie. I may even sig it. It's going to be epic, being that it's all you accuse other people of doing. I'll be waiting for your answer. LMAOOOOOOOO!

                Face it...you got caught out there. You're stuck in a corner now and you have no escape.
                Last edited by travestyny; 03-21-2017, 10:31 AM.

                Comment


                  ADP02 getting thrashed by Travestny.




                  Again.




                  Damn.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP