Originally posted by bigdunny1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Trinidad: ''He Saved Himself In Not Fighting Me'' / Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by Sun_Tzu View PostAre you seriously asking me if I think Tito Trinidad, one of the best WW of the last 25 years is better than three guys Ive barely heard of? What am I in denial of by the way? Tito was a monster at Welter, odds are he isnt going to be able to impose his will on Golovkin at MW, two weight divisions higher than his best weight. The odds are Golovkin bounces Tito off the canvas early and often. I dont really see what the problem is. Tito was not a true MW.
Again, I'll give you another scenario. Who was a better and BIGGER Welterweight, Tito or Brook?
C'mon dude. You're rocking a RJJ avi and you're having a hard time grasping multi-divisional weight Champs.
Golovkin's best years were 30-35 in the spotlight. Golovkin hasn't proven anything yet, just like Wider hasn't proven elite Heavyweight yet. Doesn't matter about Amateur records. Loma couldn't even beat Salido with 400+ amateur bouts. Rigo with 500 amateur bouts hasn't moved in class. Golovkin with 300 amateur bouts hasn't fought anybody elite yet.
Floyd Mayweather family pedigree SUPERSEDES any ''mythical'' or theoretical scenarios about Amateur skills. The Amateurs are minimal rounds, just point based, and have protected headgear. Same goes for Roy or Toney. How were their amateur backgrounds compared to the pros?
Again, this whole dogmatic Gennady myth is ridiculous. The fact that he claims to be a ''small Middleweight'' even though he's hella taller than Hagler and bigger just proves Golovkin is straight pooosie going up in weight. He knows his capacity. Zurdo Ramirez does circles around him.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by bigdunny1 View PostStill can't name a win on GGG resume better then joppy? We can keep dancing around you still mad joppy >>>> better then any GGG win
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostWhat is being ''True'' MW have anything to do with Amar Amari, Gardner or Boudla? Tito was close to 6'0, proved himself to fight hard with Joppy, Bhop, and a LHW RJJ.
Again, I'll give you another scenario. Who was a better and BIGGER Welterweight, Tito or Brook?
C'mon dude. You're rocking a RJJ avi and you're having a hard time grasping multi-divisional weight Champs.
Golovkin's best years were 30-35 in the spotlight. Golovkin hasn't proven anything yet, just like Wider hasn't proven elite Heavyweight yet. Doesn't matter about Amateur records. Loma couldn't even beat Salido with 400+ amateur bouts. Rigo with 500 amateur bouts hasn't moved in class. Golovkin with 300 amateur bouts hasn't fought anybody elite yet.
Floyd Mayweather family pedigree SUPERSEDES any ''mythical'' or theoretical scenarios about Amateur skills. The Amateurs are minimal rounds, just point based, and have protected headgear. Same goes for Roy or Toney. How were their amateur backgrounds compared to the pros?
Again, this whole dogmatic Gennady myth is ridiculous. The fact that he claims to be a ''small Middleweight'' even though he's hella taller than Hagler and bigger just proves Golovkin is straight pooosie going up in weight. He knows his capacity. Zurdo Ramirez does circles around him.
You are having a hard time I see. Amar Amari, Gardner or Boudla have nothing to do with anything concerning a fight between Golovkin and Tito, zero. Tito was a very good Welter, he was a good jmw. He imposed his will on his opponents but if you caught him and you had some pop he would go down. He went down all the time. He hit the wall at MW, he wasnt that good there. He was good enough to get a belt then get smoked by BHop. All that other shit has nothing to do with me, you are projecting every thing any golovkin fan has ever said here on me. The topic was Golovkin vs Trinidad at middleweight, you went down the rabbit hole about **** that is inconsequential to the topic.
Golovkin stops Tito somewhere around 6-7. Golovkins resume or lack there of or Trinidads run at ww/jmw has nothing to do with the inevitable outcome of this fight.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by peakbay View PostMad err no your the one going full ****** getting all flustered. It was a simple question(asking you to explain your statement but u cant) and all you could do was divert and try and change the subject Do you want me to word it differently for you or something
Comment
Comment