Mays vs Pac - Resumes

[Elroy The Great]

im tired of the BULL SHlT HYPOCRISY !!!! may gets the evil for fighting someone while pac fans :wank: when pac fighst and beat those SAME guys AFTER may has.most notably dlh.

lets do pacs resume 1st....

PAC~
lets be HONEST, from 1995-2003, FORTY fights in, is there one guy that stands out ?!?!?!?

moving on from those 1st 40 (i defy a pac fan to dispute this)......
opp/age/w-l/result
mab 29 (57-3) tko w
jmm 30 (42-2) sd d*
3k bat 30 (44-7-1) tko w
erik 29 (47-2) ud l
velaz 30 (42-10-2) tko w
erik 2 30 (48-3) tko w
larios 30 (56-4-1) ud w
erik 3 30 (48-4) ko w
solis 28 (34-0-2) ko w
mab 2 33 (63-5) ud w
jmm 2 35 (48-3-1) sd w
diaz 32 (34-1-1) tko w
dlh 35 (39-5) rtd w
hatton 31 (45-1) ko w
cotto 29 (34-1) tko w
clottey 33 (35-3) ud w
marg 32 (38-6) ud w
ssm 40 (46-6-1) ud w
jmm 3 38 (53-5-1) ud w
timmy 29 (28-0) sd lx
jmm 4 39 (54-6-1) ko l
rios 27 (31-1-1) ud w
timmy 2 31 (31-0) ud w
algieri 30 (20-0) ud w
may 38 (47-0) ud l
timmy 3 33 (33-1-1) ud w
vargas 27 (27-1) ud w

23-3x-1*;11 ko
of these 27 fights, one can say there are 17 easy auto wins. included are timmy (3x), dlh, marg, clottey, erik 2x......other jmm and may, where are the stuff of legends ?!?!? i find it curious he needed cotto to have a clause. since beating dlh, its been a pure cakewalk.

* = pac should have ''technically'' won. that 1 judge didnt score the 1st rd properly. that missing pt would have given pac the sd w vs jmm.

x = rob job. im not the biggest pac fan but even i have to admit timmy lost. technically, pac should be 25-2; 11 ko (losses to jmm and may).

id rate this resume ''good/C''.
erik, mb, jmm, dlh, ssm, marg - seen better days prior.
cotto, jmm, timmy - good wins
we know who the no hopers are

[Thraxox]

Mayweather has been fed with a silver spoon growing up in a boxing family. And Pacquiao was literally a starving kid fighting for money to put on the table. And you are asking what manny did in his first years as a professional are kidding me?

Who did May that has the equivalent of a Prime Marco Antonio Barrera at his best weight class coming of with the wins of Hamed, Ayala, and Morales?

And also, age 19 Flyweight champ, Sasakul.

[Ryan8777]

I don't think this is fair, you never mentioned the upcoming fight with the monster Jeff Horn

[iamboxing]

Mayweather has been fed with a silver spoon growing up in a boxing family. And Pacquiao was literally a starving kid fighting for money to put on the table. And you are asking what manny did in his first years as a professional are kidding me?

Who did May that has the equivalent of a Prime Marco Antonio Barrera at his best weight class coming of with the wins of Hamed, Ayala, and Morales?

And also, age 19 Flyweight champ, Sasakul.

Pacquiao started from humble beginnings but let's not forget that Mayweather had an incredible streak of wins yet wasn't given the public exposure he deserved; he had to fight over 30 fights before he was given his proper credit. The Mayweather name wasn't even big in boxing until he made it big and he had to work damn hard to do that. You make it sound like Mayweather was a household name from the very first fight. Outside of all the bling, he was the most dedicated athlete in ANY SPORT period.

[Elroy The Great]

ill do mays in a lil while.

[Thraxox]

Pacquiao started from humble beginnings but let's not forget that Mayweather had an in incredible streak of wins yet wasn't given the public exposure he deserved; he had to fight over 30 fights before he was given his proper credit. The Mayweather wasn't even big in boxing until he made it big and he had to work damn hard to do that.

And what did Pacquiao do also? Pacquiao was literally given 2 dollars per fight in his first 10. He weighed in under a hundred pounds against a grown ass men. He had to fight killers in his division to get the payday he deserved and never complained that he had to fight ATG back to back in JMM, Barrera and Morales. So who worked harder?

Imagine if the roles were switched, Pac was the guy growing up good and May was a starving kid fighting for money, and see what the result would be. You can't just say "Mayweather didn't get credit" and stick to that explanation why he worked harder than Pac when Pac was literally a malnourished kid.

[iamboxing]

And what did Pacquiao do also? Pacquiao was literally given 2 dollars per fight in his first 10. He weighed in under a hundred pounds against a grown ass men. He had to fight killers in his division to get the payday he deserved and never complained that he had to fight ATG back to back in JMM, Barrera and Morales. So who worked harder?

Imagine if the roles were switched, Pac was the guy growing up good and May was a starving kid fighting for money, and see what the result would be. You can't just say "Mayweather didn't get credit" and stick to that explanation why he worked harder than Pac when Pac was literally a malnourished kid.

But I didn't say Pacquiao didn't have a hard life. What I'm saying is Mayweather didn't have an easy life either, not as hard as Pacquiao but a drug dealing dad in jail and he wasn't rich back then, his life was ****ed up:

[BrometheusBob.]

I'd say Chatchai Sasakul (guy who beat Arbachakov) is one of his top ten wins

Morales and Barrera may have not been in their absolute primes but Morales II and Barrera I were huge wins

Anyway I'd agree Mayweather has a better resume overall. I agreed with Pac being the fighter of the decade but all things considered through now I think you have to favor Mayweather's accomplishments.

[Elroy The Great]

MAY~
the 1st 17 were the prerequisite no hopers. almost every fighter begin their careers beating up this level of opponent. just imagine what this resume would look like if may had 40 BUMS to start off with.

the meat of the resume.....

g hern 32 (38-1-1) rtd w
manfredy 24 (25-2-1) tko w
c rios 28 (44-2-1) ud w
juuko 27 (33-2-1) ko w
gerena 28 (34-2) rtd w
vargas 30 (40-6-1) ud w
eman aug 25 (22-16-4) tko w
chico 24 (33-0) tko w
c hern 30 (33-2-1) ud w
j chavez 29 (35-1) rtd w
jlc 29 (45-4-1) ud w*
jlc 29 (45-5-1) ud w
sosa 29 (35-2-2) ud w
ndou 26 (31-1) tko w
corley 30 (28-2-1) ud w
bruseles 25 (21-2-1) tko w
gatti 28 (39-6) rtd w
mitchell 35 (56-4) tko w
zab 29 (34-3) ud w
baldo 35 (43-9-6) ud w
dlh 34 (38-4) sd w
hatton 29 (43-0) tko w
jmm 36 (50-4-1) ud w
ssm 39 (46-5) ud w
ortiz 24 (29-2-2) ko w
cotto 32 (27-2) ud w
ghost 30 (31-1-1) ud w
alvy 23 (42-0-1) md w
dana 31 (35-3) md w
dana 2 31 (35-4) ud w
pac 37 (57-5-2) ud w
berto 32 (30-3) ud w

32-0;13 ko
of these fights, one can say they were all auto wins. not because THEY were horrible (some were of course). just that may was that good.

* = controversial win. the hiccup on an otherwise spotless career. i think may won by 2 rds.

id rate this resume a ''very good/B+''

[Elroy The Great]

Mayweather has been fed with a silver spoon growing up in a boxing family. And Pacquiao was literally a starving kid fighting for money to put on the table. And you are asking what manny did in his first years as a professional are kidding me?

Who did May that has the equivalent of a Prime Marco Antonio Barrera at his best weight class coming of with the wins of Hamed, Ayala, and Morales?

And also, age 19 Flyweight champ, Sasakul.

you are who you fight. i dont GIVE A FnCK about that extra shlt. tell it to yourself if you need comforting. shoe on other foot, pac fiends would piss on may too. need proof ?!?! pac fiends called dlh a glorified promoter. the same fiends then turn around and celebrate pac beating up dlh as if that shlt was special.

after SIXTY FIGHTS, mab was not prime. give yourself a break. pac had the nerve to fight him again FOUR YEARS LATER (68 fights). mab is a very good win but NOT PRIME.

and do you think for a nano second that may wouldnt have beaten that mab ?!?!?!

jfc