I don't get what's wrong with that prediction. It's a fight between the top 2 middleweights so both fighters have a chance
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"I give Jacobs a punchers chance" is just insurance for when Jacobs wins
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Eff Pandas View PostSome of you cats take picking a winner wayyyyyyy to seriously. I come for the fights. And looking at fights in a mature, logical & strategic manner I think its reasonable to find ways for either guy to win a fight.
For GGG that involves being GGG & for Jacobs that involves a nicely timed hard shot or the boxing generalship performance of his career. Of the two GGG being GGG seems like the logical choice & the most likely outcome which is leading people to the conclusion of GGG winning, but its silly to think that its impossible for Jacobs to land that one big shot that could end the night or have a poor mans Buster Douglas type night. Anyone saying "I told you so" on either side of the equation is a f#cking child.
Either you KSAB or you don't. There's no in between
Especially if you say one thing before and then talk about how you "knew" after the fight when reality is you didn't know schit
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by jreckoning View PostI know man. Jacobs is getting ****ed up.
There is no "Jacobs is getting fcuked up, but he has a puncher's chance" about it.
So once the upset happens, said poster can come back and say "I always knew Jacobs would do it"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostI can respect a prediction like this.
There is no "Jacobs is getting fcuked up, but he has a puncher's chance" about it.
So once the upset happens, said poster can come back and say "I always knew Jacobs would do it"
And funny part is, I've met Jacobs, I like the guy, good solid dude, but he ain't winning.
Comment
-
-
Comment