What i found funny is how people were talking when they thought Eubank was going to fight. Eubank has beat nothing but domestic level opponents but these guys were saying it'd be a good win.
The only people who would claim Lem knocking out Canelowould be the GGG fanatics to make GGG win looks better, and Canelo fought a better version of Monroe in Lara (GGG would fight him) and Trout. So your post makes no sense.
People were saying that Canelo couldnt fight a full 160lb fighter w/power & a lot of people (not me) had Lara winning that fight, plus you also have to take into consideration Monroe is a MW not a Jr. MW. Look man tbh I really dont care if my logic makes sense to you, just tired of the hypocrisy. Both guys to me represent what bad about boxing. I really dont like Canelo or GGG at all, if I had to choose 1 of the 2 Id probably go with Canelo because hes Mexican but thats not the right reason to back a fighter so I really shouldnt but that the only PRO I find among a bunch of Cons...
Murray B+(yes, he went to two guys courtyard and beat them, he just didnt get the nod from the judges, he is in my opinion the best guy on GGG resume)
the the others are C
Wade F-
and Brook only a B- he was a welter going to MW, at welter he is a A-
And the funny thing is those same people want a Camelto?vs GGG fight, even though clearly it would NOT be competitive.
im not desperate for it in terms of a spectacle. its not that competitive a fight, canelos a good solid fighter, GGG is an elite fighter, theres a big difference. would be funny however to hear the excuses after the fight.
People were saying that Canelo couldnt fight a full 160lb fighter w/power & a lot of people (not me) had Lara winning that fight, plus you also have to take into consideration Monroe is a MW not a Jr. MW. Look man tbh I really dont care if my logic makes sense to you, just tired of the hypocrisy. Both guys to me represent what bad about boxing. I really dont like Canelo or GGG at all, if I had to choose 1 of the 2 Id probably go with Canelo because hes Mexican but thats not the right reason to back a fighter so I really shouldnt but that the only PRO I find among a bunch of Cons...
Please enlighten us as both your posts make absolutely no sense.
Canelo hasnt fought a MW with power. Are you saying he has?
If these guys are all good matches for Canelo but **** matches for GG, then that means Canelo is easy pickings for GG. Not too hard to follow actually.
Please enlighten us as both your posts make absolutely no sense.
Canelo hasnt fought a MW with power. Are you saying he has?
If these guys are all good matches for Canelo but **** matches for GG, then that means Canelo is easy pickings for GG. Not too hard to follow actually.
Do you purposely misconstrue what I say? Basically what I am saying is GGG's last opponents wouldve been game for anyone other than him, after he fights them they are bums. These would all be great win for Canelo and I understand that Canelo hasnt fought a MW but at the same time he was the MW champ so its hypocritical for someone to grade all GGG's opponents bases on him kicking their ass when other champs might not be able to do so in such fashion.
Comment