Comments Thread For: Hopkins Confident He Would Beat Golovkin - Explains How!

[Sweet_Science2]

Let me guess, GGG has to jump up to 175 to fight you right?

Yup! Chump. But Hopkins is 50 years old. This is the type of fight pussie g loves. Mention that animal Ward and you see how you lames get. Yaw thought he was scared of Kovalev have not seen any of you same ******* claiming Ward was ducking on the recent threads showing your thrill for this great fight.

Oh please believe. After Ward puts that work in on Kovalev you might want to leave this site for about a week. Which I'm sure you will. But boxingscene will not be a comfortable place for you and all you other lames. Fair warning

[buge]

Yup! Chump. But Hopkins is 50 years old. This is the type of fight pussie g loves. Mention that animal Ward and you see how you lames get. Yaw thought he was scared of Kovalev have not seen any of you same ******* claiming Ward was ducking on the recent threads showing your thrill for this great fight.

Oh please believe. After Ward puts that work in on Kovalev you might want to leave this site for about a week. Which I'm sure you will. But boxingscene will not be a comfortable place for you and all you other lames. Fair warning

your dumb ass is banned again

[StefanTosic]

No way he blows GGG out. Anyone who says that is being hyperbolic.

Not even B-hop believes he'd wash GGG. No one in history is going walk through GGG at MW. He'd lose to some greats, at least if I judged his career now. But no one will make it easy. GGG is too good.



Tevhcally Geale wasn't a world champ, and that isn't that only former world champ he's beat. He has more sir, but the amount of world champs that ducked him, well yea.

And up if you don't think a GGG would be competitive at MW with b-hop, I don't know what to tell you. B-hop was mid 30's before he got his first big win in Tito, and yes, Tito was smaller than Brook. So if that counts for b-hop, then I'm counting Brook.

But more importantly, every time at MW B-hop stepped up to a true world champ MW, he got beat. Jones, Taylor best him twice. Not saying automatically GGG wins, but I think he does.

B-hop at 160 wasn't as good as he was at 175. He was too big to be taking off so much weight. I think it's why he did more at 175.

B-hop beat a lot if qualify MW, as GGG has. But b-hop didn't have a Canelo. He had a de la Hoya and a Tito, both much smaller than him. De la Hoya nor Tito came in heavier than b-hop at MW. Not like Brook did at 160.

My point us, b-hop v GGG is a good match. I could see it going either way, but I give it to GGG.

I see it just the same way you do.

[48cantCstraight]

This is what the sport is now, guys explaining how they'd fight each other. Get in the ring or shut the *** up.

[royjonesjrKTFO]

The Con-man wants GGG to move up like he did Tito, Oscar, Pavlik, Winky. Hopkins is gonna fight another bum and then call himself GOD. And dumbasses on here will believe it.

[PoserExposer]

Why would I not be honest about Joe Calzaghe schooling him? No doubt I had him losing. Look, I like Bernard but he likes to talk out of his rear when it comes to GGG and white fighters in general. The fight was offered to him last year and he passed. Now he wants GGG to go to 168. Why? So he doesn't break his middleweight title defenses? The one he should tell to go north is Canelo with his Cinderella 155 weight class.

Be honest, have you seen this fight?

[Bandman]

il never bet against bhop

[Hot Shyt]

No way he blows GGG out. Anyone who says that is being hyperbolic.

Not even B-hop believes he'd wash GGG. No one in history is going walk through GGG at MW. He'd lose to some greats, at least if I judged his career now. But no one will make it easy. GGG is too good.



Tevhcally Geale wasn't a world champ, and that isn't that only former world champ he's beat. He has more sir, but the amount of world champs that ducked him, well yea.

And up if you don't think a GGG would be competitive at MW with b-hop, I don't know what to tell you. B-hop was mid 30's before he got his first big win in Tito, and yes, Tito was smaller than Brook. So if that counts for b-hop, then I'm counting Brook.

But more importantly, every time at MW B-hop stepped up to a true world champ MW, he got beat. Jones, Taylor best him twice. Not saying automatically GGG wins, but I think he does.

B-hop at 160 wasn't as good as he was at 175. He was too big to be taking off so much weight. I think it's why he did more at 175.

B-hop beat a lot if qualify MW, as GGG has. But b-hop didn't have a Canelo. He had a de la Hoya and a Tito, both much smaller than him. De la Hoya nor Tito came in heavier than b-hop at MW. Not like Brook did at 160.

My point us, b-hop v GGG is a good match. I could see it going either way, but I give it to GGG.

8 years ago BHop wasnt fighting at 160. I think that version of BHop would beat GGG

[PunchyPotorff]

Quote:
Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
GGG fans fail on so many levels to accept their cult leader's limitations. He doesn't do well vs solid boxers with some pop. Brook proved that undeniably. BHop would likely lose, but not before embarrassing GGG a good bit.

They dont know boxing , they know Boom Crash Pow , casual fans can see power they cant see the rest of it .

Truer words never spoken.

[Strive 4 Truth]

Taylor would be one of the few guys that could back up ggg behind the jab..

No one yet has been able to force ggg backwards and no one knows how Golovkin reacts. Taylor can hurt anyone if he lands flush and ggg has shown a penchant for getting hit flush

Interesting...Pavlik is no near GGG and was able to weather the storm. GGG has a better chin and more power so how do you come up with that theory? Taylors claim to fame was beating an aging fighter....what did he do after that?