Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who did better vs Geale: Golovkin or Cotto?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who did better vs Geale: Golovkin or Cotto?

    Both Golovkin and Cotto knocked Geale down and out early. Comparing their performances, the compubox numbers seem to slightly favor Cotto.

    Stats for Golovkin vs Geale:
    Golovkin landed 56 out of 191 (29% connect)
    Geale landed 40 out of 140 (29% connect)

    Stats for Cotto vs Geale:
    Cotto landed 68 out of 183 (37% connect)
    Geale landed 33 out of 127 (26%)

    However, 2 things need to be taken into account:
    1. Cotto vs Geale was at a catchweight of 157
    2. Golovkin vs Geale had a 4-minute first round.

    So for those of you who saw both fights in their entirety, who do you think did better vs Geale and what did their fights vs Geale tell us?



    44
    Golovkin
    38.64%
    17
    Cotto
    45.45%
    20
    About the same
    15.91%
    7
    Last edited by Ricky Bahl; 09-01-2016, 07:51 PM.

    #2
    Originally posted by Kim Jong Pimp View Post
    Both Golovkin and Cotto knocked Geale down and out early. Comparing their performances, the compubox numbers seem to slightly favor Cotto.

    Stats for Golovkin vs Geale:
    Golovkin landed 56 out of 191 (29% connect)
    Geale landed 40 out of 140 (29% connect)

    Stats for Cotto vs Geale:
    Cotto landed 68 out of 183 (37% connect)
    Geale landed 33 out of 127 (26%)

    However, 2 things need to be taken into account:
    1. Cotto vs Geale was at a catchweight of 157
    2. Golovkin vs Geale had a 4-minute first round.

    So for those of you who saw both fights in their entirety, who do you think did better vs Geale and what did their fights vs Geale tell us?



    I voted Cotto

    Miguel didn't get his head snapped back...hell he hardly got touched....plus he's a smaller man.

    People know GGG would win....Cotto.....hmmm

    Comment


      #3
      It tells us that GGG's opposition hasn't been that great.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Kigali View Post
        I voted Cotto

        Miguel didn't get his head snapped back...hell he hardly got touched....plus he's a smaller man.

        People know GGG would win....Cotto.....hmmm
        Agreed. Cotto boxed beautifully and took Geale apart. GGG bum rushed Geale and got hit a lot.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by Bipolar Hero View Post
          Agreed. Cotto boxed beautifully and took Geale apart. GGG bum rushed Geale and got hit a lot.
          Yep....good thing for Golovkin,Geale isn't a puncher.

          Comment


            #6

            Any other instances of taking someone's best shot only to 1 shot counter KTFO?

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by KeyboardWarrior View Post

              Any other instances of taking someone's best shot only to 1 shot counter KTFO?
              That best shot was from a guy that can't punch for shi.t.

              If Geale had any power GGG would have been on his back dreaming about throwing that punch.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by KeyboardWarrior View Post

                Any other instances of taking someone's best shot only to 1 shot counter KTFO?
                Better to win without getting touched.

                Comment


                  #9
                  1) People seem to forget the huge headbutt that Cotto performed on Geale before Geale was KD from that left hook.
                  2) Geale moved up to 168 after being drained by Cotto at 157.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by Bipolar Hero View Post
                    Better to win without getting touched.

                    Cotto blocked and countered

                    GGG got caught clean and countered.

                    Cotto is a product of competitive divisions while GGG is a product of a dead division.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP