I've seen Golovkin called a one-division coward, whatever the hell that means. Was Jake LaMotta a one-division coward? Graziano? Hagler? I myself don't see anything wrong with staying in one division and if he was even a couple of years younger, I'd say stay at middleweight until every ducker had to fight him or move on. I agree that he would be more tested at 168, but I don't think he's a coward in any way.
That said, Rigondeaux will only fight at 122. 122. 1. 2. 2. His next division is 4 pounds away. For Golovkin to move up would mean 8 pounds vs. 4 pounds? If you bash Golovkin for this, you have to bash Rigondeaux as well. Any great at 122 moved up to 126 and 130 as Barrera, Morales, Marquez and Pacquiao all did. I don't care that Rigo stays where he's at, but if Golovkin gets heat over one division, so should every other fighter who's at one division. Yet, I don't see any threads about them. So I thought I'd start with Rigo.
That said, Rigondeaux will only fight at 122. 122. 1. 2. 2. His next division is 4 pounds away. For Golovkin to move up would mean 8 pounds vs. 4 pounds? If you bash Golovkin for this, you have to bash Rigondeaux as well. Any great at 122 moved up to 126 and 130 as Barrera, Morales, Marquez and Pacquiao all did. I don't care that Rigo stays where he's at, but if Golovkin gets heat over one division, so should every other fighter who's at one division. Yet, I don't see any threads about them. So I thought I'd start with Rigo.
Comment