Originally posted by therealpugilist
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is there a more boring fighter in the sport than andre ward?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by chris232 View Postyou all moan saying golovkins got to step up when hes not even big at the weight. Yet when brook steps up above his normal weight 'oh no hes got no chance just wants money, mismatch' so basically you all want golovkin to step up in weight and lose
bROOK is unproven in his home division
Comment
-
Originally posted by chris232 View Postwhy am i considered some second rate/casual/knucklehead fan just cause i find wards spoiler style boring as ****. You, kigali etc are like one of them snob winetasters who makes out the premium wines are amazing when they are actually ****e just to appear knowledgable. No man with a pair of working eyes can enjoy watching andre ward fight.
Only appreciating the offensive part of boxing doesn't make you second rate or a knucklehead, but it does make you a casual fan. What makes me a fan is when a fighter uses his tools (no matter what they are) to overcome or offset his opponents strengths to lead to a W. I am equally impressed when a fighter uses his strengths so well his opponent can't overcome or offset them.
Are you sure you're not just being harsh on Ward because this board has been so harsh on g string lately?
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Postmaybe to you and a small minority....last a i checked, a p4p top 3 middleweight is suppose to knock out a welterweight with one top ten win in his entire career
if that is impressive to you, your standards arent very high
would you be impressed if Kovalev knocked out BJS? He has never been stopped either
Comment
-
Originally posted by casualfan View Postyou're a moron, first Brook has fought above 147 over 10 times, secondly is hagler a bum since he got outboxed by SRL?
he beat cans over ww, and has done nothing over the weight and barely anything @ ww
so the guy doesnt cut weight 10 times, now he is a legit challenge for a middleweight? Get the **** outta here
you called hagler a bum.....You do know leonard won titles at 147 and 154 before he fought Hagler right? also was an all time great
weak azz analogy
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Postwhat titles has he won over 147? who of significance has he beat over 147?
he beat cans over ww, and has done nothing over the weight and barely anything @ ww
so the guy doesnt cut weight 10 times, now he is a legit challenge for a middleweight? Get the **** outta here
you called hagler a bum.....You do know leonard won titles at 147 and 154 before he fought Hagler right? also was an all time great
weak azz analogy
Comment
-
Originally posted by therealpugilist View Postwhat titles has he won over 147? who of significance has he beat over 147?
he beat cans over ww, and has done nothing over the weight and barely anything @ ww
so the guy doesnt cut weight 10 times, now he is a legit challenge for a middleweight? Get the **** outta here
you called hagler a bum.....You do know leonard won titles at 147 and 154 before he fought Hagler right? also was an all time great
weak azz analogy
Comment
-
Comment