Originally posted by Eastcoast
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Golovkin vs. Eubank: Hearn Aims To Finalize Deal in 48-72 Hours
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Kagami Taiga View PostBJS I guess he is...but really what has he dine besides beat Andy Lee? And Eubank lost that fight so there's that. Chudinov is not world level. Good try. And me being tired of hearing about him doesn't mean I can't comment in a thread about him. Learn to separate the different and stop being a drone.
Yeah, if you're tired hearing about someone, don't come around b*tching about them. It kinda makes you a hypocrite.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Eastcoast View PostListening to you critic BJS is funny, "but really what has he dine besides beat Andy Lee?" What have alot of guys done that's so special? What's Danny Jacobs' done other than beat Quillin. And what in your opinion makes a guy eligible to be in your 'world level' rating (don't answer I don't care). You mention better fights to make, then don't mention any. Probably afraid of being criticized.
Yeah, if you're tired hearing about someone, don't come around b*tching about them. It kinda makes you a hypocrite.
As far as Daniel Jacobs is concerned, hes fought better opposition than Eubank and he's at least equal with BJS in resume. I would accept that fight as well. And i have already mentioned fights I think would be better so instead of whining like an incessant girl I suggest you look through my post history and and shut up.
Are we done here?
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostEXACTLY. To act as though fighting at the division limit is somehow being "inflexible". Its insane the lengths these clowns will go to.......
Comment
-
Originally posted by El-blanco View PostIt's their welfare mentality. Same reason they refuse to get off welfare unless someone gives them some high paying job that they've done nothing to earn. That's why they think BJS or Jacobs deserves something absurd despite there being no rational reason to do so. Throw in the fact that they hate Golovkin and this is the ****** arguments they come up with.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostWhat's insane is that you ignore the point to throw out something derogatory. Only a boxing neophyte would ignore the fact that in boxing history weight concessions have been made to make big fights. As I have said in many previous posts, the K2 decision to only fight at 160 shouldn't be looked down upon. We just can't ignore that decision in order to call a potential opponent scared.
other than DLH-Hops, please point out ONE title unification fight that involved a catchweight. Just one. I'll wait........
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Ake-Dawg View PostClaiming folks hate Golovkin doesn't discredit the justified opinions of many. A Trip fight can only generate a $5M total purse with the right opponent. That opponent deserves his market value for that fight, regardless of what their previous career high purse was. That doesn't mean Trip gets the smaller split, it just means that he is in no position to get 80-20 splits from the likes of Saunders Eubank or Jacobs.
Comment
-
-
Comment