Why is Pac vs AB a good fight, but Floyd vs AB isn't?

[MPX309]

Ok this is a legitimate question? I agree Pac vs Broner is a good fight, but a few weeks ago when the rumour mill got spinning that AB might be facing May, I didn't hear one person say that would be a good fight?

I think whoever AB fights out of those 2 it would have been a good match.

[soul_survivor]

I don't think many are claiming it to be a "good" fight. It's certainly a step down for Pacquiao, who has just fought Bradley. Having said that, the reason people are enjoying this idea and semi announcement is just to see how badly Broner will get beat up.

With Mayweather, it would've been tip tap all night long.

[*TonyMontana*]

Cos PAC beatsdown A.B badly with a slight chance of being ko himself while floyd just outboxes him

[BrometheusBob.]

Because Floyd is better than Pac. Also neither are good fights tbh, they had some intrigue at an earlier point in time but now it's whatever.

[*TonyMontana*]

Because Floyd is better than Pac. Also neither are good fights tbh, they had some intrigue at an earlier point in time but now it's whatever.

Yep I could live without either fights ever happening

[Doctor_Tenma]

Broner is better than Berto and Pacquiao is well past his prime, so I'm struggling to care. I'd enjoy it.

[FrankieClutch]

I have yet to find anyone that thinks either is a good fight

[Motorcity Cobra]

Because everybody knows beating Broner equals beating Mayweather.

[koolkc107]

Who says Pac vs Broner is a good fight?

Boner couldn't even muster enough discipline to compete with Porter, a fighter he is far more skilled than.

And Pac decisively beat Bradley, who is twice the fighter Porter is.

It wouldn't be a contest, just one long ass whipping from Pac for whatever length of time it lasted.

[WesternChamp]

who is saying pac vs AB is a good fight?? the thread yesterday was filled with post like "pac is gonna ko broner", "i'll love to see broner take an ass whooping". stop making stuff up.