Originally posted by Chollo Vista
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mayweather: I'm Not Ducking Golovkin, When Will He Move Up?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostSo then what did Golovkin's team mean when they said he could beat anyone from 154-168?
Did you think that all fights with fighters from 154 and 168 would be held at 160, respectively?
Secondly, I took out the rest of your post because in so many words, you're saying GGG shouldn't place himself at any disadvantages prior to a mega fight?
Got it.Last edited by richardt; 05-14-2016, 04:56 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostNo sht Hagler said he wouldn't fight Spinks because he did not have to fight Spinks and NO fighter has to jump up in weight to be near great or great, duh!
Like I said before, even though Hagler only stayed at one weight, he gave into several concessions throughout his career that had nothing to do with weight.
Why can't GGG give into one concession?
Don't include GGG and Hagler in the same sentence about anything. Two different scenarios.
Comment
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostDid GGG or his team say they would go up in weight and back down????? NO. !
His trainer and promoter have both said they would go up fight Froch, DeGale, Chavez Jr, etc and then come right back down to 160.
Have you even followed the sport?
Do you need me to post the articles and video of them saying this?
Do you think if they go to 168 against Ramirez they would stay at 168?
Do you think if they go to 154 for Mayweather, they will stay at 154?
Are you ******ed or mentally challenged?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostNo one gave a schit about Hagler not fighting Spinks because Hagler said he wouldn't fight anyone at 175, not he'll fight Spinks at 170 and Dwight Qwai, Mathew Saad Muhummand, and Marvin Johnson at 175.
Like I said before, even though Hagler only stayed at one weight, he gave into several concessions throughout his career that had nothing to do with weight.
Why can't GGG give into one concession?
Don't include GGG and Hagler in the same sentence about anything. Two different scenarios.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chollo Vista View PostAre you ******ed?
His trainer and promoter have both said they would go up fight Froch, DeGale, Chavez Jr, etc and then come right back down to 160.
Have you even followed the sport?
Do you need me to post the articles and video of them saying this?
Do you think if they go to 168 against Ramirez they would stay at 168?
Do you think if they go to 154 for Mayweather, they will stay at 154?
Are you ******ed or mentally challenged?
Comment
-
-
How are most of you defending this crap?
Ward's moved up himself and is lookin at Kovalev, are you actually expecting GGG to move up 2 divisions to fight the guy before he has even unified? GGG said he wants to unify, let the man unify first for God sake, the only reason Floyd says this is to GUARANTEE he doesn't have to fight him! LOL Tyson said it best "he's a Scared little man" lol.
Comment
-
Originally posted by richardt View PostObviously you have the I.Q of a dead rat because Ward is a Light Heavyweight currently and GGG never said he would go up to fight anyone in that division and then back down to below 160 in his next fight so stop with the BRAINLESS trolling!!
So obviously I'm talking about when Ward was at 168. Duh!
GGG has said he would go up to 168 and then back down to 160. In fact, that means he would've been willing to go up to 168 for Froch, Chavez Jr, Thomas O, Ramirez, etc, and then back down to 154 for Mayweather and then back to 160 to finish unifying.
He and his team said this, not me.
Originally posted by richardt View PostONE concession is to fight below 160, NOT to go up and then back down. That is a B1TCH Diva demand and you know it!!
"Golovkin's Promoter: If GGG beats DeGale at 168, he'll return to 160"
Now please STFULast edited by Chollo Vista; 05-14-2016, 05:09 PM.
Comment
Comment