Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kellerman Taking The Pisss...''50-0 is not a thing, Chavez was 87-0..''

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Chavez didn't beat bums, he made them LOOK like bums because he was that good.

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by -PBP- View Post
      He's right though. Roman Gonzalez is 45-0. So if he fought 5 bums then retired he would hold the record. It makes no sense. It's just a matter of when you want to stop fighting.

      I know baseball statistics are easy for casuals to understand but boxing just isn't a sport that can be broken down by numbers.
      Same for Wins and Losses - they don't tell the full story sometimes. Its one of the least objective sports in the world

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by KLockard23 View Post
        Chavez didn't beat bums, he made them LOOK like bums because he was that good.
        he fought a dude who was 1-15 in his 6th year as a pro...he did beat some good fighters no doubt, but he also beat A LOT of bad fighters along the way

        Comment


          #34
          exactly, kellerman is right cause everything is subjective nothing is finitive.

          You can say chavez fought alot of nobodies on that way to 87, then you can say mayweather fougth a bunch of lifeless names to make it to his 49-0, and you both will be right.

          and sure people will argue their side but all that dont means shit cause the first two statements will still be true.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by SilverMiles View Post
            Too be fair if Chavez fought in the 4 belt era a lot of those suppose bums would have also been world champions.
            He fought in a era that had 3 belts so whats the difference??? Mayweather mostly only fought for the WBC in his career so i dont get your point at all

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by larryxxx... View Post
              He fought in a era that had 3 belts so whats the difference??? Mayweather mostly only fought for the WBC in his career so i dont get your point at all
              The clown actually believed Chavez fought in the one belt era.

              Comment


                #37
                To much politics these days. You can't compare the warriors from back then to these business men we have today. It's one of the main reason boxing is struggling these days.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                  The clown actually believed Chavez fought in the one belt era.
                  Hilarious aint it

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by torosboxing75 View Post
                    To much politics these days. You can't compare the warriors from back then to these business men we have today. It's one of the main reason boxing is struggling these days.
                    what does that have to do with Chavez??? out of over 100 fights he was 18-4-2 against current or past champions....Floyds resume ****s all over chavez's

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by larryxxx... View Post
                      what does that have to do with Chavez??? out of over 100 fights he was 18-4-2 against current or past champions....Floyds resume ****s all over chavez's
                      Floyd always avoided guys when they were a true threat too.
                      Chavez didn't give a crap.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP