Sergey Khomitsky
-
-
Lemiuex, Murray and Gaele are all about equal but very different. The fact that he handled a powerful bull with his boxing, a rough and tough guy with decent skill making him say uncle and battering a quicker guy who can box.
None of those dudes are all that impressive but handling all three decent fighters that are totally different is impressive.Comment
-
Murray no doubt.Comment
-
It would have to be Murray. Not much to say about Murray, durable guy who has never been dominated. But he typically comes up short.Comment
-
Lemieux was the most dangerous, Murray the most durable and Geale the most accomplished.
But Golovkin really needs to step it up with his opposition and step it up soon.Comment
-
I guess this is fair. Combined they would make one impressive ass win lol.Originally posted by Shrap View PostComment
-
I think he brought it all against David ... His best technical fight by far... IMO Lemieux took more beating than Murray and I'm not sure who else would have stood there for 8 rounds with the amazing amount of shots coming...
A Lemieux/GGG 2 will happen for sure, and this time David might be better prepared knowing what's coming...Last edited by Superbee; 04-26-2016, 11:27 PM.Comment
-
-
I would say Trout. He was soaring with confidence, undefeated, and coming off his biggest win against Cotto who's a tough customer himself. In Cotto's backyard.Originally posted by Sterling Archer View Post
So provided the circumstances, Trout was. Bit this thread is f about Canelo. It wasn't a bait thread or a thread to out GGG. Everybody knows the situation, I just wanted to see what the general consensus was for his best win.
Also, the Lara fight was too close to be considered Canelo's best win. It really could have gone either way. Lara banked the rounds, and Canelo landed the meaningful punches. They should do it again to settle the score, imo.Comment
-
Murray. That's really not a good look.Comment
Comment