Originally posted by Spoon23
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WHO ??? came closest to beating FLOYD???
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Spoon23 View PostToo much excuses here. Smells like im in ***** st.
Im out!
How old are you? Are you a spambot? Do you dream about PAC?
Would you buy his jock strap?
Would you lick his balut, and svck his lumpia?
Did PAC KO himself on the fist of Marquez? Did PAC do that intentionally to lure Floyd out?
What does ***** Street smell like? Share your vast knowledge with us.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostNow that, is a big question. A loaded question for sure.
i have stated earlier the need to go over this based o what transpired on the ring.....
i have to bluntly point out now the disconnect between your castillo 1 vote and your "official results" basis.....
floyd vs castillo 1 was a UD verdict, yes or no?
floyd vs oscar was a SD verdict, yes or no?
so, based on the above, who came closest to beating floyd? castillo? oscar?
you included mosley in the list...floyd vs mosley was also a UD verdict......yes? no?
BUT the UD verdict was/is not indicative of WHAT REALLY HAPPENED in round 2...the official scores won't reflect that!
so you justified including mosley in view of round 2.....
and i find that reasonable....got no problem with that....
and so i voted mosley.....not because of your "official results" basis but because of WHAT TRANSPIRED/HAPPENED in the ring.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostI had no idea PAC fans would bend space and time to try to get a win for PAC.
Spoon and a few other hardcore PAC fans are the few that don't get this poll.
PAC wins always to you guys, even when he gets knocked out. PAC wins because miss universe got revenge for PAC.
I think my poll is very clear, except I never factored in how PAC fans see things.
I realize that my poll is only clear to clear minded people. It is probably a complex poll for PAC fans, because I didn't add in potential PAC excuses.
You know there is actually no Spoon type investigation. No TUE controversy. None of that actually exists.
Unlike others. I gotta base my poll on official results as a starting point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Postit is a shame a simple yes or no question won't be answered clearly by you, the op?!...
i have stated earlier the need to go over this based o what transpired on the ring.....
i have to bluntly point out now the disconnect between your castillo 1 vote and your "official results" basis.....
floyd vs castillo 1 was a UD verdict, yes or no?
floyd vs oscar was a SD verdict, yes or no?
so, based on the above, who came closest to beating floyd? castillo? oscar?
you included mosley in the list...floyd vs mosley was also a UD verdict......yes? no?
BUT the UD verdict was/is not indicative of WHAT REALLY HAPPENED in round 2...the official scores won't reflect that!
so you justified including mosley in view of round 2.....
and i find that reasonable....got no problem with that....
and so i voted mosley.....not because of your "official results" basis but because of WHAT TRANSPIRED/HAPPENED in the ring.....
So now we are down to score cards? Not winner or loser?
If you look at the voting, ODLH is doing real bad. PAC doing even worse.
Do you actually believe PAC won? I believe, Floyd is a hugging drug cheat. My opinion. PAC & Marquez are drug cheats. Based on the official W/L column, Floyd is undefeated. I personally do not think so, but based on who got the win is the starting point for this thread.
Pac lost 118 to 110, several guys, including ring side commentators agreed.
I don't agree. Not at all, it was closer, and I would have deducted a point or two from Floyd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zaroku View PostSo now we are down to score cards? Not winner or loser?
If you look at the voting, ODLH is doing real bad. PAC doing even worse.
Do you actually believe PAC won? I believe, Floyd is a hugging drug cheat. My opinion. PAC & Marquez are drug cheats. Based on the official W/L column, Floyd is undefeated. I personally do not think so, but based on who got the win is the starting point for this thread.
Pac lost 118 to 110, several guys, including ring side commentators agreed.
I don't agree. Not at all, it was closer, and I would have deducted a point or two from Floyd.
try to understand.....open your eyes.....
open your mind.....
stick to the thread topic....came closest! just almost!
like you're so near....yet so far.......
from fully understanding....
Comment
-
Originally posted by tangalog2200 View Postplease review post #563, read it slowly and carefully....
try to understand.....open your eyes.....
open your mind.....
stick to the thread topic....came closest! just almost!
like you're so near....yet so far.......
from fully understanding....
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by MASTERBX View PostNo one! I have never watch a Floyd fight and said to myself, "Floyd is losing this fight."
Of all the boxers Floyd didn't knock out, who did the best against him?
I am not trying to invalidate your opinion, many others agree with you. Yet, we have hard core insane fans that believe their guy won.
Who did the best against Floyd?
No slow motion video bull****
No what Spain thought
No what Nacho thought
Who did the best against Floyd in your opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post... it was about "WHO ??? came closest"... Castillo did...
The fight's are over. Floyd and Connor seems odd to me. I doubt it will happen.
I hope the top WW fight each other now, and don't try to be PPV players. I just hope boxing fans get good fights.
Comment
Comment