Originally posted by FlatLine
View Post
I still remember that people, even on the island, were saying Judah would beat Cotto. That ended up being a CLASSIC fight and one of the cornerstones of Cotto's career. And the undefeated version of Malignaggi was one heck of a fighter himself. Had it not been for the hellacious beating Cotto gave him (cuts, fractured orbital bone, and damaged jaw), I suspect Malignaggi could've gone on to have quite the career before his flaws would've gotten the better of him. And I know a quote I received myself from someone, whom I'm not naming, after that fight. And it was exactly this: "He will never be the same again."
My whole point is that it's cool to support Khan in this uphill battle he's going to face, but perspective and facts are very important. Equating Khan's victories over those fighters to Cotto's is like assuming that Mayweather's resume is loaded with "prime" fighters. Mayweather fought names, but EVERYONE knows WHEN he fought them. Everyone knows he cherry-picked, instead of fighting them in their prime. No amount of winning can erase that.
I had to clear it up because I see some people nowadays acting like Cotto needs another "signature win," diminishing the importance of the people he faced. Cotto did not beat Pinto, N'dou, Bailey, Corley, Malignaggi, Gomez, Mosley, Quintana, Torres, Judah, and so forth when they were past-prime. Quite possibly, Cotto has the best resume in terms of consistent, quality competition of this era. That's a whole different situation from an up-and-comer like Khan (back then) being intelligently hyped up by GoldenBoy, taking on faded names.
Comment