Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PAC loss to BRADLEY: Would Legacy be Tarnished??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    PAC loss to BRADLEY: Would Legacy be Tarnished??

    I am curious to know how boxing fans and historian's would look at PAC's Legacy? Any Guesses?

    After all, PAC's KO loss to Marquez was very significant.
    PAC's decision loss to Floyd in the biggest fight our era is significant.

    How would a KO victory for Bradley look on his resume?

    I don't expect it to happen, but this is boxing!

    If Bradlley were to clearly beat PAC, how would that impact his legacy???
    Last edited by Zaroku; 01-09-2016, 08:21 PM.
    #2
    Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
    I am curious to know how boxing fans and historian's would look at PAC's Legacy? Any Guesses?

    After all, PAC's KO loss to Marquez was very significant.
    PAC's decision loss to Floyd in the biggest fight our our era is significant.

    If Bradlley were to clearly beat PAC, how would that impact his legacy???
    His legacy was already tarnished after Mayweather. I do t think of him the same, do you? He's just second fiddle boy around my household. What about yours?

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by SeekDaGreat View Post
      His legacy was already tarnished after Mayweather. I do t think of him the same, do you? He's just second fiddle boy around my household. What about yours?
      He definitely fell from grace in my home too. Marquez started it, Floyd definitely exposed the myth of Manny invincibility.

      Comment

        #4
        Absolutely not. Why would it?

        Comment

          #5
          Naw see this is what I dont like about triology that shouldent happen, who ever wins the last one is usually seen as the king.

          Now we all can agree that bradley didnt win the first or 2nd bout but if he wins the 3rd somehow it should effect pacquaio legacy GTFOH.

          How many tries you gonna give someone to beat you, then when he finally does it means something lmfao HEll NO

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
            I am curious to know how boxing fans and historian's would look at PAC's Legacy? Any Guesses?

            After all, PAC's KO loss to Marquez was very significant.
            PAC's decision loss to Floyd in the biggest fight our era is significant.

            How would a KO victory for Bradley look on his resume?

            I don't expect it to happen, but this is boxing!

            If Bradlley were to clearly beat PAC, how would that impact his legacy???
            PAC is top 20 to top 10 depending on who u talk to right now. Jmm and gfloyd loss don't effect PACs standing. Loss to jmm gave people the ammunition to suggest PAC is overrated, but he came back well from that loss, to suggest reversing the idea that he was overestimated would be sensible thing to do!

            If he were to lose to Bradley again people would claim PAC was overrated. But then again there are enough people who remember what PAC was and assume PAC just lost the desire to fight and was more politician right now because anyone knows peak PAC only loses to Bradley in your dreams
            But PAC is taking a risk. Bradley is a very good fighter and if you give very goog fighter 3 chances to beat you, they might get lucky*cough cough jmm*
            Last edited by hugh grant; 01-09-2016, 08:34 PM.

            Comment

              #7
              Not really. Pacquiao has been on the decline since 2010-2011. It's now 2016. Pacquiao lost all of his luster when Marquez knocked him out, anyone who says otherwise is in denial.

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                PAC is top 20 to top 10 depending on who u talk to right now. Jmm and gfloyd loss don't effect PACs standing. Loss to jmm gave people the ammunition to suggest PAC is overrated, but he came back well from that loss, to suggest reversing the idea that he was overestimated would be sensible thing to do!

                If he were to lose to Bradley again people would claim PAC was overrated. But then again there are enough people who remember what PAC was and assume PAC just lost the desire to fight and was more politician right now because anyone knows peak PAC only loses to Bradley in your dreams
                But PAC is taking a risk. Bradley is a very good fighter and if you give very goog fighter 3 chances to beat you, they might get lucky*cough cough jmm*
                Interesting take. Let's see if Bradley can have a career defining win over Manny.
                I think Manny has a lot to prove, and that will motivate him. I think Manny will win, but you never know.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by sparkman0811 View Post
                  Not really. Pacquiao has been on the decline since 2010-2011. It's now 2016. Pacquiao lost all of his luster when Marquez knocked him out, anyone who says otherwise is in denial.
                  Manny PAC fans believe Marquez tripped/foot stomped PAC and Caused him to KO himself as he fell forward.

                  I think they are in denial, but they have slow motion video they claim proves it.

                  Very interesting way of seeing things!

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
                    Manny PAC fans believe Marquez tripped/foot stomped PAC and Caused him to KO himself as he fell forward.

                    I think they are in denial, but they have slow motion video they claim proves it.

                    Very interesting way of seeing things!
                    Hello. Im here. Im not saying anything close to what you've posted.


                    Why would a loss to Bradley mess up Pacquiaos legacy?

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP