Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Garcia: Bradley Has a Shot To Beat Pacquiao For Real

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by revelated View Post
    I'm glad we agree. To the larger point you don't understand the way boxing BUSINESS works, either.

    It's not about who the fan favorite is. It's about who can sell Vegas. That's NOT Crawford and it's NOT Khan. Broner can't sell nothing after two losses and then facing a guy fresh off a loss.

    Bradley can sell Vegas because he's fresh off of knocking out the guy who was NEVER KNOCKED OUT BEFORE and who MANNY COULD NOT HURT, where Manny is fresh off a loss to TBE. Bradley holds the belt Manny took back from him years ago. He's now a threat to Manny, pure and simple. The question is, will Manny retire as champion and lock the trilogy in the books, or will Bradley retire Manny in disgrace?

    I fail to understand why that concept is difficult for you.
    Unfortunately for you: you know what I forgot and I forgot nothing.

    All you are is a cheerleader, you must work for TR to come up with all this none sense. Next thing you are going to tell me is that Bob Arum is a honest to God individual

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by STREET CLEANER View Post
      Unfortunately for you: you know what I forgot and I forgot nothing.

      All you are is a cheerleader, you must work for TR to come up with all this none sense. Next thing you are going to tell me is that Bob Arum is a honest to God individual
      All I am is a person who understands how business works. You keyboard warriors can keep on complaining about the state of boxing or you can roll with it.

      I for one want to know for sure whether Atlas has improved Bradley enough to beat Pacquiao. Frankly, I'd LOVE to see Pacquiao stopped by Tim Bradley and retired in disgrace - tons of excuses, poor performances, with the history books reflecting that:
      • Juan Manuel "Dinamita" Marquez softened him up after 3 screwjobs
      • Floyd "Money" Mayweather took his manhood from him and domesticated him for 11 rounds
      • Timothy "Desert Storm" Bradley retired him and set up shop at the top of the P4P Welterweight list


      But you warriors will just say "Pac's washed up doe" instead of giving the man his due, and despite the fact Pac is still younger than Floyd and Bradley's near 40's.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by revelated View Post
        All I am is a person who understands how business works. You keyboard warriors can keep on complaining about the state of boxing or you can roll with it.

        I for one want to know for sure whether Atlas has improved Bradley enough to beat Pacquiao. Frankly, I'd LOVE to see Pacquiao stopped by Tim Bradley and retired in disgrace - tons of excuses, poor performances, with the history books reflecting that:
        • Juan Manuel "Dinamita" Marquez softened him up after 3 screwjobs
        • Floyd "Money" Mayweather took his manhood from him and domesticated him for 11 rounds
        • Timothy "Desert Storm" Bradley retired him and set up shop at the top of the P4P Welterweight list


        But you warriors will just say "Pac's washed up doe" instead of giving the man his due, and despite the fact Pac is still younger than Floyd and Bradley's near 40's.
        Now you putting words in my mouth that I never said. Look back in my posts and seek any of those things that you said that I have mentioned.

        You are the one that said that I don't know shyt about boxing. That is some thing you can do only in writing behind a keyboard but not in person. I didn't even provoke you. So you are the pretending key word warrior.

        I don't take these things seriously but obviously you do. Next thing you know you will be telling me that you are going to cause me bodily harm the way you are going.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by STREET CLEANER View Post
          Now you putting words in my mouth that I never said. Look back in my posts and seek any of those things that you said that I have mentioned.
          You also don't know how boards work either. Easy steps to help you.
          1. Go to the post where I quoted you.
          2. See that little arrow next to your name in the quote block? Click it.
          3. Guess what? It takes you RIGHT to your post where you said that sentence.


          You're complaining about a fight for emotional reasons. I said you don't understand how boxing business works. That's fact. If you did, you'd at least give credit to the fact that Bradley is the only one of the four that has the ability to sell Vegas - and that Bradley's earned the shot. That's it.

          All you care about is your hatred over Bradley winning the first fight. You can't look past something that wasn't his fault and you're ignoring that he's #2 P4P right behind Manny for a reason.

          I'd have respected you more if you said, as others did, "it's a good fight, Bradley's deserving, I just don't want to see it."

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by revelated View Post
            I'm glad we agree. To the larger point you don't understand the way boxing BUSINESS works, either.

            It's not about who the fan favorite is. It's about who can sell Vegas. That's NOT Crawford and it's NOT Khan. Broner can't sell nothing after two losses and then facing a guy fresh off a loss.

            Bradley can sell Vegas because he's fresh off of knocking out the guy who was NEVER KNOCKED OUT BEFORE and who MANNY COULD NOT HURT, where Manny is fresh off a loss to TBE. Bradley holds the belt Manny took back from him years ago. He's now a threat to Manny, pure and simple. The question is, will Manny retire as champion and lock the trilogy in the books, or will Bradley retire Manny in disgrace?

            I fail to understand why that concept is difficult for you.
            Bradley was caught and hurt against Pacquiao and openly admitted It In the following Interview.



            Bradley Is a threat to Pacquiao and will win the fight If Pacquiao Is not at 100% but I cannot see this fight doing very good PPV numbers. Time will tell.

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by revelated View Post
              You also don't know how boards work either. Easy steps to help you.
              1. Go to the post where I quoted you.
              2. See that little arrow next to your name in the quote block? Click it.
              3. Guess what? It takes you RIGHT to your post where you said that sentence.


              You're complaining about a fight for emotional reasons. I said you don't understand how boxing business works. That's fact. If you did, you'd at least give credit to the fact that Bradley is the only one of the four that has the ability to sell Vegas - and that Bradley's earned the shot. That's it.

              All you care about is your hatred over Bradley winning the first fight. You can't look past something that wasn't his fault and you're ignoring that he's #2 P4P right behind Manny for a reason.

              I'd have respected you more if you said, as others did, "it's a good fight, Bradley's deserving, I just don't want to see it."
              Even Bob Arum says that the fight is a tough sell.

              Comment


                #37
                because he beat your punching bag??

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP