Daniel Jacobs hints at the GGG fight happening in 2016

[brettWall]

Funny part here is Jacobs could well be the guy who would beat 3G. (I don't believe in triangles like getting KD'd by Mora. It rarely work.) I even thought Quillin could do it based on his Lee performance, and Peter was heavily favored in the Jacobs fight. Unfortunately, Jacobs is negotiating the 3G fight from an already defeated state. Beating Quillin didn't boost his confidence. It's pathetic.

[ИATAS]

What's funny is you were making threads talking about Jacobs is coming for Golovkin, the fight will be made in 2016, posting highlights of Jacobs saying is Golovkin ready for this?! Going on saying why doesn't K2 talk about Jacobs? And then after k2/GGG say they want Jacobs, then suddenly you're playing boxing manager, saying K2 needs to pay Jacobs $3-$4 million and at the same time talking about "who are we to dictate what a fighter is worth" etc etc etc. Jacobs literally said he wants another 1.5 years before Golovkin, which obviously goes against your Jacobs will fight Golovkin in 2016 talk, and yet you're cool with that and some how shift the blame on k2/GGG because no network will pay Jacobs that kind of money.

The bottom line is this - Jacobs is in a mandatory position to fight Golovkin. If he wanted to, he could have at this very least requested the WBA enforce his mandatory status, start negotiations and if it goes to a purse bid, at the very least see what happens and if he doesn't feel the money is right, don't fight. He hasn't done ANY of that. Instead he's fine fighting Sergio Mora again, letting Eubank get a crack at Golovkin instead and wait at least 1.5 years before even attempting to fight Golovkin. This is the guy you're defending? **** that. There are no excuses, it's real simple - either he wants to fight Golovkin or he doesn't. He's made it clear he is not interested any time soon. Money is always the convenient excuse with h guys who don't want to fight. Like Santa Cruz asking for over three million to fight rigondeaux knowing damn well no one will pay for that and so on.

[HeroBando]

I made this thread after HBO had new management and you were the idiot claiming the fight still couldn't be negotiated. Just admit you're a nescient a$$hole that passes dogmatic assumptions as facts.

Btw why did you lie about this, shameless little fanboy? Did you read through the thread to find such posts? No luck? As you saw I was spot on on everything, including not believing that 6m for Bjs for one second, which your moronic a$$ was pushing as evidence Jacobs deserves 4-5m lol

[_Maxi]

What's funny is you were making threads talking about Jacobs is coming for Golovkin, the fight will be made in 2016, posting highlights of Jacobs saying is Golovkin ready for this?! Going on saying why doesn't K2 talk about Jacobs? And then after k2/GGG say they want Jacobs, then suddenly you're playing boxing manager, saying K2 needs to pay Jacobs $3-$4 million and at the same time talking about "who are we to dictate what a fighter is worth" etc etc etc. Jacobs literally said he wants another 1.5 years before Golovkin, which obviously goes against your Jacobs will fight Golovkin in 2016 talk, and yet you're cool with that and some how shift the blame on k2/GGG because no network will pay Jacobs that kind of money.

The bottom line is this - Jacobs is in a mandatory position to fight Golovkin. If he wanted to, he could have at this very least requested the WBA enforce his mandatory status, start negotiations and if it goes to a purse bid, at the very least see what happens and if he doesn't feel the money is right, don't fight. He hasn't done ANY of that. Instead he's fine fighting Sergio Mora again, letting Eubank get a crack at Golovkin instead and wait at least 1.5 years before even attempting to fight Golovkin. This is the guy you're defending? **** that. There are no excuses, it's real simple - either he wants to fight Golovkin or he doesn't. He's made it clear he is not interested any time soon. Money is always the convenient excuse with h guys who don't want to fight. Like Santa Cruz asking for over three million to fight rigondeaux and so on.

Don't lose more time on these assh0les, they know they're wrong.

[Ray*]

Has the WBA called for this fight yet? I hate this Super and regular champion sh:t.

[Chollo Vista]

Btw why did you lie about this, shameless little fanboy? Did you read through the thread to find such posts?

As stated previously, you were the nescient a$$hole that dogmatically insisted that Jacobs vs GGG couldn't be negotiated because GGG was under exclusive contract with HBO. And I quote:

I don't, and they're under no obligation to disclose the terms. But as the article states, and as common sense would have it, he's under exclusive contract with HBO. And that won't change for a while

I can't believe you're still at it, still trotting out same dumb arguments. Gggs contract with HBO did not end with Monroe, they put him on Ppv next dude! He's a linchpin of HBO boxing. Adama was 2 years ago when Ggg was making 400k, and in Monaco dude. Fcuking A.

Why don't you stop making dumb threads and go tweet Jacobs to call out the champ? That Jacobs interview yesterday shows you Ggg is not on the agenda at all

No its not, that article doesn't address what happened after Monroe. Cause you know, its old. Just use you head for once man.

Did you know Gggs HBO contract ran out after Curtis Stevens? It's true, there's links to prove it

Maybe dumb people would think that, that HBO wouldn't lock in one of their main guys before unexpectedly featuring him on Ppv.

The point with Stevens is obviously that once a contract ends, a new one is signed for a guy of Gggs appeal. Anyway see this article, says Ggg is under exclusive contract. Most would get there using common sense

//krikya360.com/golovkin-...-agree--100777

Now, will you admit you were wrong or continue to try and spin?

[Chollo Vista]

What's funny is you were making threads talking about Jacobs is coming for Golovkin, the fight will be made in 2016, posting highlights of Jacobs saying is Golovkin ready for this?! Going on saying why doesn't K2 talk about Jacobs? And then after k2/GGG say they want Jacobs, then suddenly you're playing boxing manager, saying K2 needs to pay Jacobs $3-$4 million and at the same time talking about "who are we to dictate what a fighter is worth" etc etc etc. .

I don't know why you feel the need to re-write history.

Everything I've said is locked in this thread.

From day one I've said "why doesn't Team GGG chase a fight with Jacobs and give him the fair money he's asked for".

At this point, for the first time in history, someone from from Team GGG is publicly stating they're interested for a fight with Jacobs; however, we still have yet to get over the hurdle of "what's fair money". I know what the GGG Legion think fair money is, but I, nor does anyone else know specifically what "fair money" was offered to Daniel Jacobs to make the GGG fight.

All we know is that Jacobs is still saying that he wasn't being offered fair money, but was being offered the same money he made against Quillin even though Tom Loeffler himself has said Jacobs vs GGG in NYC is HUGE and there's $$$ available for it.

If you give Jacobs the same $$$ he made for Quillin, even though GGG is much more of a risk than Quillin was, essentially you're saying Peter Quillin is the same economic star as GGG.

Tom Loeffler himself has said there's $$$ for Jacobs vs GGG, but that number has yet to be disclosed specifically. I guess NATAS and Co knows more about the economics of GGG vs Jacobs than Tom Loeffler.

[Chollo Vista]

Funny part here is Jacobs could well be the guy who would beat 3G. (I don't believe in triangles like getting KD'd by Mora. It rarely work.)

This is correct

[HeroBando]

As stated previously, you were the nescient a$$hole that dogmatically insisted that Jacobs vs GGG couldn't be negotiated because GGG was under exclusive contract with HBO. And I quote:










Let's see how you spin this one

Lol you sad thing

1. None of those you quoted are from this thread , like you lied about
2. None of those posts say the fight is unmakeable, like you lied about
3. They're all spot on. Ggg is an Hbo exclusive and linchpin of HBO boxing. They didn't let his contract lapse like you thought lol. They're going to Kazakhstan to film a documentary on him

[Chollo Vista]

1. None of those you quoted are from this thread , like you lied about

I knew you said it in one of my threads, which is correct. Point is you said GGG vs Jacobs wasn't possible because GGG was on contract with HBO. Now you flop and say you never said it

2. None of those posts say the fight is unmakeable, like you lied about

Try again. The name of my thread was "Debunking the PBC fighters can't fight on HBO Theory Myth and GGG's HBO contract". You were arguing that the fight couldn't be made because of the contract. Why try to spin everything? Do you have that much pride?

3. They're all spot on.

No, they're not. GGG is with HBO, but Loeffler is negotiating with PBC/Haymon just like I told you he could do. Why continue to embarrass yourself and play semantics?