Damn, when you know you're this good if every opponent is a mismatch and has to be prevented by NSAC.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Andre Ward-Murdock Rejected By NSAC as Mismatch
Collapse
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostBarcham said that the only rankings that matter are the belt rankings. Murdock was #6 on WBO. SMFH, this guy deserves justice. He is the WBO's #6 best fighter and he's a mismatch for Andre Ward. Imagine if GGG vs Adama, Monroe Jr, Ishida happened in Las Vegas, would the NSAC have rejected them as mismatches as well?
Comment
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostBarcham said that the only rankings that matter are the belt rankings. Murdock was #6 on WBO. SMFH, this guy deserves justice. He is the WBO's #6 best fighter and he's a mismatch for Andre Ward. Imagine if GGG vs Adama, Monroe Jr, Ishida happened in Las Vegas, would the NSAC have rejected them as mismatches as well?
Comment
-
Originally posted by mike1010011 View PostHe was ranked #6 by the wbo at 168. The fight would be at 175,a weight the 23 year old kid had never fought at. Don't try to twist this,and make it look like it wasn't going to be a complete mismatch.
Comment
-
ward fans defending ward and his choice of opponents. no surprise. the biggest hypocrites ever. talk sh-it about ggg because no one would fight him but defend ward who tries to fight bums as his first option. 4 years running now and they still defending this clown. he can do no wrong.
Comment
Comment