I think it's rather the sign of a knowledgeable forum, where people can separate the "wishing it was so" from the "knowing it isn't".
How so? Seems like your "wishing" ggg made as much money, accomplished as much and was as popular as Broner. But we "know" that isn't true right? Add to the fact that AB is 9 years younger than ggg, he's still got a long shelf life and ggg, well, his shelf life is limited.
No he would not. He is flawed...right down to his character and maturity. He would have lost no matter what. He's not elite material. But if he kept fighting the Carlos Molinas and Gavin rees' of the world forever, you may have a point.
GGG I flawed..... 135 AB would've been as dominant as GGG is at 160...gotta give him credit for taking on all comers
How so? Seems like your "wishing" ggg made as much money, accomplished as much and was as popular as Broner. But we "know" that isn't true right? Add to the fact that AB is 9 years younger than ggg, he's still got a long shelf life and ggg, well, his shelf life is limited.
Try again bud.
I'm not the one backing a fighter that's losing on my own poll by 75%.
If you're not gonna like the answer you get..... then don't ask the question.
I'm not the one backing a fighter that's losing on my own poll by 75%.
If you're not gonna like the answer you get..... then don't ask the question.
Bud.
Seems to me you can't make a valid argument on the subject. The poll was for lulz. You think I care? The accolades and the truth speak for themselves though...
Comment