Comments Thread For: Postol Reveals Terence Crawford Refused To Fight Him

[Reloaded]

That's my point. Or whatever the guys name is who Crawford is fighting next.

Postol got plenty of them on his resume , Gamboa is better than anyone Postol has beat , I think they just bringing both these guys along , hope the fight gets made .

[SweetPbfAli]

I'll take that bet.

There will be no holding in that fight, Crawford can't fight in the pocket and won't be looking to get inside Postol, it'll be a chess match in which Postol will clearly come out on top.

Crawford is a good fighter but he's not as good as I initially thought, he's become ridiculously overrated, people even have him in their top 10 P4P which is ridiculous. The guy was being outboxed by 5'5 Gamboa, if Gamboa wasn't like 2 weight classes smaller, he wins that fight east. He was being outboxed by C level Dulorme as well.

I don't see the fight being made anyway, Imam's gonna beat Postol, then we'll be talking about Imam vs Crawford. Imam definitely wins that one.

I think Imam is a KO waiting to happen and I like him but there are some bad habits i've noticed about him. Are you not going to acknowledge the adjustments Crawford made against Gamboa in order to change the tide of that fight? Crawford is the most versatile of the crop at 140 and he hasn't even peaked yet and neither has Imam but head to head, i'll take Crawford all day.

[-Kev-]

That's my point. Or whatever the guys name is who Crawford is fighting next.

I don't understand what your point is. I'm not a TC fanboy, I am just pointing out the Postol was neither high risk, low risk, or low reward, his status was just unknown. He had one decent win. Now we know he is a good fighter. Back then who ever "ducked" him really did not matter, they weren't ducking anyone of note in Postol. Now people can start claiming this. Not before the Matthysse fight.

If DSG or Crawford beat Postol before, that would have been nothing of note in my eyes, they wouldn't have beaten anyone who had a notable win on their resume. It's always better to at least let a fighter get a good win before hyping him up as a lake monster. Aydin? Robert Guerrero beat him too, no big win there. Matthysse is much better now ot support hypebeasts' claims.

[HanzGruber]

Tc had a prett crappy year. I'm sure this will happen next year. In a perfect world tc postol ab and Cuenca would fight then the winners for unification. But one can dream

[richardt]

I don't understand what your point is. I'm not a TC fanboy, I am just pointing out the Postol was neither high risk, low risk, or low reward, his status was just unknown. He had one decent win. Now we know he is a good fighter. Back then who ever "ducked" him really did not matter, they weren't ducking anyone of note in Postol. Now people can start claiming this. Not before the Matthysse fight.

If DSG or Crawford beat Postol before, that would have been nothing of note in my eyes, they wouldn't have beaten anyone who had a notable win on their resume. It's always better to at least let a fighter get a good win before hyping him up as a lake monster. Aydin? Robert Guerrero beat him too, no big win there. Matthysse is much better now ot support hypebeasts' claims.

You said that you understand fighters (like Crawford) not caring about fighting Postol because he was not well known before the last fight and my response was that Crawford's next opponent is Dierry Jean who is no more known than Postol, so apparently being well known is not the criteria Crawford is using.