Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd is #7 All time according to a "fair and objective site"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
    This clearly went over ya'lls heads...lol
    I'm really confused about some posters here. How can you miss this?

    Comment


      #12
      monzon is number 8 so i'm cool with this

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
        I'm really confused about some posters here. How can you miss this?
        I think some just log on to strictly try to be negative about Floyd and miss the sarcasm

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
          Seems fair.

          Seems objective.

          Tiger at #9. I love that.
          Did he put you on ignore yet?? lol

          Comment


            #15
            How's Marciano not #1? He beat #'s 1,4,5..

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Jsmooth9876 View Post
              How's Marciano not #1? He beat #'s 1,4,5..
              You have to go by the computer. It's fair and objective and doesn't have American media bias

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                I'm really confused about some posters here. How can you miss this?
                Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
                This clearly went over ya'lls heads...lol
                lolwut? I get that this is a jab at Freedom's post on Wlad being #1 P4P on BoxRec. What does that have to do with the fact that the jab is dumb? I'm still not getting how the fact BoxRec is consistent (which is true) means that it is correct. I could make a scoring system that is just +1 for a win, +.5 for a draw, and -1 for a loss. It would be fair and consistent, but what it means is another question.

                Maybe I missed something about Freedom's post, but I don't think he was trying to say that BoxRec's rankings are inherently correct because they are fair and consistent. At least I hope not.

                Comment


                  #18
                  bruh, lay off freedom

                  a black dude going ham on him online might crumble him

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
                    lolwut? I get that this is a jab at Freedom's post on Wlad being #1 P4P on BoxRec. What does that have to do with the fact that the jab is dumb? I'm still not getting how the fact BoxRec is consistent (which is true) means that it is correct. I could make a scoring system that is just +1 for a win, +.5 for a draw, and -1 for a loss. It would be fair and consistent, but what it means is another question.

                    Maybe I missed something about Freedom's post, but I don't think he was trying to say that BoxRec's rankings are inherently correct because they are fair and consistent. At least I hope not.
                    Exactly how is it consistent?

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
                      Did he put you on ignore yet?? lol
                      Of course

                      Right after he said I hate Wlad because he knows for a fact I'm a fan of Wlad.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP