Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Holy crap!!!

    I just found a draft but it looks like the Floyd/USADA did find a loop hole in the NSAC's rules. Either it was intentional or not, it looks like the NSAC is using Floyd's IV scandal to close up the loopholes!!!


    So here is proof that the NSAC determined that what Floyd/USADA did was not acceptable!!! They are amending their rules to make it clear.



    467.0030 “Program of drug testing” defined
    NAC 467.0030 “Program of drug testing” defined (NRS 467.030) A “program of drug testing” means a Commission approved and administered program.



    NAC 467.032 Applicant for unarmed combatant’s license must demonstrate understanding of anti-doping policy. (NRS 467.030, 467.100)
    Before a license application or license renewal can be approved the applicant must show his or her understanding of the rules, regulations and potential penalties of the Commission’s anti-doping policies. The Commission may require the applicant to pass a written or on-line examination.




    NAC 467.462 Unarmed combatant required to submit to drug testing both in and out of competition (NRS 467.030, NRS 467.---(A.B.467 Section 1))1.
    An unarmed combatant shall submit to drug testing at any time, in or out of competition as directed by a representative of the Commission, except a blood sample may not be required within 7 days of competition.
    2.
    The cost and expenses for testing shall be the responsibility of the promoter who is promoting the event in which the
    unarmed combatant is scheduled to compete or with whom the promoter has contracted.
    3.
    Pre and post-fight drug testing may be performed by a person designated by the Executive Director or the Commission’s representative.
    NAC 467.465 Contracts to perform drug testing must be approved by the Commission (NRS 467.030)
    1.
    The Commission must approve, in advance, any contract between a promoter and third party to perform drug testing. The Commission is authorized to reject any or all third party contracts. The Commission is authorized to reject any third party contract for drug testing that is or may be performed by the Commission pursuant to NAC 467.462.
    2.
    The Commission shall be provided complete results of all tests performed by any approved third party.
    3.
    All contracts and test results may become public records pursuant to NRS Chapter 239.
    .
    NAC 467.467 Credits against license fees (NRS 467.030, NRS 467.---(A.B.467 Section 1))
    1.
    Any credits will be issued against the full licensing fee as defined in A.B.476 Section 1.
    2.
    Any credit against the license fees paid by the promoter for a program of drug testing must be pre-approved







    NAC 467.528 Physical examination required at weigh-in. (NRS 467.030)
    1.
    A physician designated by the Commission shall give each unarmed combatant a thorough physical examination at the time of his or her weighing in before a contest or exhibition., which will include completion of a written pre-fight medical questionnaire. Each unarmed combatant shall complete the pre-fight medical questionnaire and attest to the accuracy of its contents under threat of penalty of perjury.



    BELOW IS A HINT OF WHEN FLOYD USED HIS IV!!!
    ************************************************** ********

    2.
    An unarmed combatant must report to the Commission or Executive Director any infusions, medical treatment, outpatient treatment, or hospital admission that takes place after the weigh-in and prior to the contest.



    ************************************************** ********

    NAC 467.558 The****utic use exemptions must be approved by the Commission (NRS 467.030)
    1.
    All applications for a the****utic use exemption must be submitted and approved by the Commission at least 7 days in advance of any contest if practicable or immediately upon prescribed need before the contest.
    2.
    The Commission may request any additional medical information as necessary in determining whether to grant a the****utic use exemption.
    3.
    The Commission will not grant a retroactive the****utic use exemption.

    4.
    The Commission will not grant a the****utic use exemption for testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) or any other similar therapy designed to induce or simulate testosterone replacement.
    5.
    The****utic use exemptions must be renewed annually.
    6.
    The****utic use exemptions may become public records pursuant to NRS Chapter 239




    PROHIBITED ACTS; DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS

    "NAC 467.850 Administration or use of alcohol, stimulants, drugs or injections; urinalysis or chemical tests; disciplinary action. (NRS 467.030)
    1. The administration of or use of any:
    (a) Alcohol;
    (b) Stimulant; or
    (c) Drug or injection or methodology that has not been
    approved by the Commission, including, but not limited to, the drugs or injections or methods listed in subsection 2,
     in any part of the body, either before or during a contest or exhibition, to or by any unarmed combatant, is prohibited.
    2. The following types of drugs, injections or stimulants, or methods are prohibited pursuant to subsection 1:
    (a) Afrinol or any other product that is pharmaceutically

    f) With the exception of stimulants listed in section S-5 and S-6 of the World Anti-Doping Agency’s Prohibited List, which are to be prohibited at all times, any prohibited substance or method drug identified on the most current edition of the Prohibited List published by the World Anti-Doping Agency (“WADA”), which is hereby adopted by reference. The most current edition of the Prohibited List may be obtained, free of charge, at the Internet address . WADA’s definitions, prohibited lists, prohibited methodologies and tolerance levels will be used in interpreting violations of NAC 467.850 et.seq.


    e. Avoiding testing/detection/ urine sample adulterated, not from athlete or not of human origin, adulterants, drugs (including
    diuretics) used as masking agents:

    Comment


      Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
      So, it can accurately be stated that the NSAC can decide what constitutes actual evidence!! If that is true, they can also decide what isn't evidence..

      Are you with me??
      Do you agree??

      That being said, no matter how sad certain "true boxing" fans are about their decisions... They do have authority to make decisions in the state of Nevada.

      Now.. Maybe an appeal to the NSAC might be a better use of energies??
      Read my post above this one. Its very interesting what the NSAC might do. See the draft.

      Comment


        Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
        Read my post above this one. Its very interesting what the NSAC might do. See the draft.
        In my profession, poorly drafted legislation/rules are only fine tuned when exceptions appear.

        Now they are fine tuning the rules.. So at the time, at the time, Floyd did nothing wrong, according to the rules in effect at that time...


        Yes or No?

        Comment


          IV is legal in nevada, so a TUE wouldn't be needed.

          nice try.

          Comment


            Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
            Read my post above this one. Its very interesting what the NSAC might do. See the draft.
            Does the NSAC have the authority to create and enforce rules in Nevada??

            Spoon23, jump in please. Please and anyone else who has an opinion..

            does the Nevada State Athletic Comission have the right to create and enforce boxing rules in the state of Nevada???

            Spoon, yes or no??

            Comment


              Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
              In my profession, poorly drafted legislation/rules are only fine tuned when exceptions appear.

              Now they are fine tuning the rules.. So at the time, at the time, Floyd did nothing wrong, according to the rules in effect at that time...


              Yes or No?
              Incorrect. The NSAC had requested Manny to be investigated for the same the Floyd didn't do. Reveal to the NSAC his medical condition. Worse in Floyd's case because he actually used an IV.

              Secondly, the NSAC stated back then that it was "unacceptable". Now they are just making sure that no loopholes are there.




              but part of me wonders if the NSAC was waiting for Floyd to retire first before amending. First I said, maybe just a coincidence but then I noticed also this.


              Here is trying to make sure that the Maidana gloves scandal does not happen 24 hours before the fight. Where Floyd used his A side and demanded 24 hours before the fight to agree to using different gloves.

              Requirements for gloves. (NRS 467.030) The gloves used in a contest or exhibition must meet the following requirements:
              1. The gloves must be examined by the representative of the Commission and the referee. If padding in any glove is found to be misplaced or lumpy or if any glove is found to be imperfect, or not in compliance with any written contract or agreement between the contestants, the glove must be changed before the contest or exhibition starts. No breaking down, roughing or twisting of gloves is permitted.
              2. The gloves for every contest or exhibition that is designated as a main event must be new, furnished by the promoter no less than 7 calendar days in advance of the scheduled bout, and made to fit the hands of the unarmed combatant.


              Unarmed combatants shall use only those brands and models of gloves that have been approved by the Commission for their contest or exhibition.
              8. Any written contract or agreements between the contestants with respect to acceptable gloves for a bout must be furnished to the Commission not less than 7 calendar days before the scheduled bout.

              Comment


                Originally posted by original zero View Post
                IV is legal in nevada, so a TUE wouldn't be needed.

                nice try.
                Floyd voluntarily paid USADA 150K to make sure that Floyd was allowed to use an IV ..... BUT according to USADA/WADA it is illegal!

                Comment


                  Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                  Incorrect. The NSAC had requested Manny to be investigated for the same the Floyd didn't do. Reveal to the NSAC his medical condition. Worse in Floyd's case because he actually used an IV.

                  Secondly, the NSAC stated back then that it was "unacceptable". Now they are just making sure that no loopholes are there.


                  but part of me wonders if the NSAC was waiting for Floyd to retire first before amending. First I said, maybe just a coincidence but then I noticed also this.


                  Here is trying to make sure that the Maidana gloves scandal does not happen 24 hours before the fight. Where Floyd used his A side and demanded 24 hours before the fight to agree to using different gloves.

                  Requirements for gloves. (NRS 467.030) The gloves used in a contest or exhibition must meet the following requirements:
                  1. The gloves must be examined by the representative of the Commission and the referee. If padding in any glove is found to be misplaced or lumpy or if any glove is found to be imperfect, or not in compliance with any written contract or agreement between the contestants, the glove must be changed before the contest or exhibition starts. No breaking down, roughing or twisting of gloves is permitted.
                  2. The gloves for every contest or exhibition that is designated as a main event must be new, furnished by the promoter no less than 7 calendar days in advance of the scheduled bout, and made to fit the hands of the unarmed combatant.


                  Unarmed combatants shall use only those brands and models of gloves that have been approved by the Commission for their contest or exhibition.
                  8. Any written contract or agreements between the contestants with respect to acceptable gloves for a bout must be furnished to the Commission not less than 7 calendar days before the scheduled bout.

                  It wouldn't have mattered whether or not he retired. The decision at the time the IV occurred would not be changed..

                  So the powers passed it over.. Welcome to the real world. It is over!
                  Nothing will change!!!

                  Sue the NSAC..
                  Last edited by Zaroku; 03-17-2016, 10:29 PM.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                    Floyd voluntarily paid USADA 150K to make sure that Floyd was allowed to use an IV ..... BUT according to USADA/WADA it is illegal!
                    Floyd *and* Manny voluntarily paid, and they really paid 100k because you get 50k back after the fight.

                    IV was legal in Nevada for any reason, but because Floyd and Manny paid for additional voluntary regulations, IV was only legal under certain conditions.

                    Those conditions were met.

                    According to USADA/WADA, IV is illegal without special permission, but special permission was granted.

                    There is no controversy here other than the one you've created in your head.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
                      Incorrect. The NSAC had requested Manny to be investigated for the same the Floyd didn't do. Reveal to the NSAC his medical condition. Worse in Floyd's case because he actually used an IV.
                      Here is why you are wrong. Floyd and Manny had to answer very specific questions. One of the questions was, do you have a shoulder injury?

                      There was no question that said "predict if you're going to feel ill hours from now."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP