Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)

[Spoon23]

Original Zero-

It's called red flags and the tapestry of corruption carefully woven to protect the golden child of Vegas.

But off course you rather wear those horse blinders to serve and protect your cheating hero.

Carry on!

Cheers!

[original zero]

Spoon -

You can keep posting the same false information if you want, but it's already been corrected.

And with Pacquiao splitting the cost of testing, does that mean Pacquiao bribed them too?

As has already been explained, the cost of testing varies because #1 - 33% of the "fee" covers a legal retainer in the event there is a failure and future litigation. That fee is returned otherwise.

The bigger the fight, the bigger potential legal scandal in the event of a failure, and therefore, the bigger the retainer that is necessary to protect the testing agency.

If you have fighters in multiple locations, multiple countries, etc, being tested over a longer period, expenses go up. 36k is not the "standard" cost. There is no standard cost. Depends on the fight.

The bigger the fight, the bigger the expense. Has always worked that way.

But since you're just flinging **** from your mom's basement and take no responsibility when your lies are exposed, nothing stops you from posting the same garbage over and over. Even though it's been exposed repeatedly.

Cheating hero? If I had a hero, it sure as hell would not be Floyd Mayweather. Puh leeeeeze . . . I wouldn't piss on that guy if he was on fire.

Doesn't mean I'm going to let you lie about NSAC's rules though.

[Spoon23]

Lol false?

You wish.

Oh Im happily married. Mr assuming guy lol

Your just blind. You can't see through the obvious signs.

And you must be leaving under a rock to think USADA is a clean drug testiing agency. That agency doesn't catch cheaters. They are more like paid posers that will shut their mouths up for a fee.

Anyway.

Go on.

[Spoon23]

Another one of that raises an eyebrow that shows how easy it is to show something does not add up and a clear red flag to the boxing community. Yes, Floyd may have gotten away with it technically, but action speaks louder than their cover up.

After the weigh-in Floyd's chugging water orally with no signs of dehydration. He even spoke to the interviewee he is ready and feels good for tomorrow's fight.

The nsac doctor cleared him of no signs of dehydration during the weigh-in. So how the hell that in a span of less than one day in the biggest fight of his life the world turned upside down for Froid and suddenly became severely dehydrated and he needed IVS. That is an obvious red flag in the avenue of public opinion.

mayweather loves saying: Out of the mans own mouth...."I never had a problem making 147lbs"

The more Froid sweeps this under the rug. The more he will look guilty. As 10 months has past, he rather zip it.








Hauser article



Floyd damaging evidence wanting retroactive TUE in their contract @ 9:10 (retroactive treatment)

[original zero]

You've repeatedly stated that Nevada required a TUE for IV use. That was 100% false. So no, I don't "wish." If I could wish, my wish would be for you to stop lying.

I don't believe you're happily anything, let alone happily married. Nobody with any level of happiness with obsess to such a ridiculous degree over such a non-issue.

IV was legal in Nevada. In any amount. For any reason. Manny & Floyd voluntarily agreed to seek USADA's approval for any IV use. Everything was done by the book.

All your "eyebrows" and "red flags" are simply your own paranoia.

I get paid to post here. What's your excuse?

Illnesses can occur that make it difficult to retain water and lead to dehydration.

Just because we don't know the specifics of why a paramedic was called doesn't mean we get to make up reasons or lie.

Floyd gave a urine sample right before the IV. If it was a system flush, why would he do that?

Your position doesn't make any sense.

[Rath]

produce proof of dehydration

produce proof of notification

produce proof paramedic

produce proof of copy of application.

all of them not just one or two.

(must be reliable, authenticated, authrorized, notarized, hard copies)

how hard is it for those genius floyd fans to do?

[Rath]

You've repeatedly stated that Nevada required a TUE for IV use. That was 100% false. So no, I don't "wish." If I could wish, my wish would be for you to stop lying.

I don't believe you're happily anything, let alone happily married. Nobody with any level of happiness with obsess to such a ridiculous degree over such a non-issue.

IV was legal in Nevada. In any amount. For any reason. Manny & Floyd voluntarily agreed to seek USADA's approval for any IV use. Everything was done by the book.

All your "eyebrows" and "red flags" are simply your own paranoia.

I get paid to post here. What's your excuse?

Illnesses can occur that make it difficult to retain water and lead to dehydration.

Just because we don't know the specifics of why a paramedic was called doesn't mean we get to make up reasons or lie.

Floyd gave a urine sample right before the IV. If it was a system flush, why would he do that?

Your position doesn't make any sense.

that urine sample he gave pre iv was mixed by USADA with the sample given post IV

[original zero]

produce proof of dehydration

produce proof of notification

produce proof paramedic

produce proof of copy of application.

all of them not just one or two.

(must be reliable, authenticated, authrorized, notarized, hard copies)

how hard is it for those genius floyd fans to do?

you guys are the ones claiming NSAC & USADA are lying and part of some giant cover up.

so the onus would be on you to produce reliable, authenticated, authorized, notarized hard copies proving floyd was no dehydrated, proving he didn't notify USADA, proving there was no paramedic, proving there was no application, etc.

i don't have to prove anything. it's indisputable fact that NSAC allowed IV in any amount for any reason and indisputable fact that USADA okayed the IV as well.

so it's case closed unless you can provide the level of proof you are demanding to show that NSAC & USADA are involved in a giant conspiracy and cover up.

otherwise it's just the rantings of a few bitter nerds in their basement.

[Rath]

you guys are the ones claiming NSAC & USADA are lying and part of some giant cover up.

so the onus would be on you to produce reliable, authenticated, authorized, notarized hard copies proving floyd was no dehydrated, proving he didn't notify USADA, proving there was no paramedic, proving there was no application, etc.

i don't have to prove anything. it's indisputable fact that NSAC allowed IV in any amount for any reason and indisputable fact that USADA okayed the IV as well.

so it's case closed unless you can provide the level of proof you are demanding to show that NSAC & USADA are involved in a giant conspiracy and cover up.

otherwise it's just the rantings of a few bitter nerds in their basement.

i proved to you and to all genius floyd fans that he was not dehydrated

i asked for the proof of notification - if i was saying there was no notification (hard copy) then how can i prove it? by presenting an invisible hard copy of notification? LOL your logic is flawed.

i asked for proof of registered nurse errr.... i mean paramedic. if i said there was no registered nurse or paramedic how will i prove that to you, by showing you a photo of an invisible nurse or paramedic? your logic is flawed LOL

I asked for proof of TUE application. if i said there were no copy of TUE application, how can i prove that to you by showing you blank sheet of papers? your logic is flawed LOL

[Spoon23]

I get paid to post here. What's your excuse?

You get paid to post here. Hmmm.. Interesting.. Who's paying you? Froid? Your employer is so worried he's too paranoid he'll get caught? Lol

If this is a non issue in your book then why are they paying you? Let me guess,

OPERATION DAMAGE CONTROL tsk tsk tsk..

Non issue? They would go to great lengths to pay you. Right it's a non issue.

Gotcha! Hahaha the plot thickens..

Your boss must be squirming to put a lid to this damaging thread, since the cat is out of the bag. The thing is Trying to conceal it is impossible now. Tell your employer there is no point in paying you for your services. You can't save what is already out. Froid is guilty beyond reasonable doubt in the court of public opinion.

No way around it bud. Your employer is wasting his money on you lmao


Floyd damaging evidence wanting retroactive TUE in their contract @ 9:10 (retroactive treatment)