Originally posted by ADP02
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mayweather's IV injection (Master thread)
Collapse
-
-
surprised no one has done this yet but now that im looking at the comparison mayweather actually looks very drained and dry at the weigh in
Comment
-
Floyd took an IV for a reason. But NSAC would not investigate on it because its the past already, Floyd brings money to Las Vegas, and it would look bad if indeed there was a violation of Floyd
Of course USADA would refute Hauser. If a company is being attack, then it would defend itself and counter the accusations.
No investigation would happen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by loui_ludwig View PostFloyd took an IV for a reason. But NSAC would not investigate on it because its the past already, Floyd brings money to Las Vegas, and it would look bad if indeed there was a violation of Floyd
Of course USADA would refute Hauser. If a company is being attack, then it would defend itself and counter the accusations.
No investigation would happen.
Comment
-
How many of you were singing the praises of CIR testing to show definitively if Mayweather was juicing?
Then USADA reveals that CIR testing was done....and suddenly no more mention of the importance of CIR testing.
Carry on.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cinci Champ View Posthave u even thought for a second that the reason was he was dehydrated? the only thing floyd is guilty of is lying about how easily he made weight as he got older
According to WADA policies/regulations, which USADA follows, the amount that Floyd took of the the IV, it should have been done in a medical facility. But instead there was a paramedic in his house. If a paramedic was involve, then why didn't he go to the hospital.
There is a video of Floyd drinking water, immediately after the weigh in.
Go ahead and believe that Floyd lied about easily making weight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hardvibes View PostAnd you believe them? (of course you do, you don't see the big picture)
Another pathetic floyd fan added to my ignore list.
Thank you. Your choice of me on your ignore list is truly a badge of honor!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cinci Champ View Post
surprised no one has done this yet but now that im looking at the comparison mayweather actually looks very drained and dry at the weigh in
There's a difference between ripped and dry. DRY looks sick.
During the fight. That's when he was able stuff himself of IV mass. What you just shown is his heavier version.
Hence, he hides his fighting weight so no one will know he got bigger. So many red flags can't count anymore lol
DOUG Fischer even mentioned how huge Floyd is compared before. Huge huge! What we can say is the man doesn't fight fair. Just how it is buddy.Last edited by Spoon23; 09-27-2015, 11:41 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by travestyny View PostHow many of you were singing the praises of CIR testing to show definitively if Mayweather was juicing?
Then USADA reveals that CIR testing was done....and suddenly no more mention of the importance of CIR testing.
Carry on.
Now factor in the number of days a fighter can go on in a year knowing full well that they will not be tested. Also, that USADA testing dates have been relatively the same for all its testing as the fight approaches, an athlete can find many ways to beat this test and others.
Read below and you will see that its not as simple as you think:
"Athletes have learned they can take small amounts—known as “microdosing—to evade detection and still get the benefits."
"CIR Testing is also far from foolproof. An athlete might stick to small doses because the test isn’t sensitive enough to detect the synthetic testosterone in urine at low concentrations. It’s also likely that kitchen chemists who work in sports doping are engineering synthetic testosterone with just the right ratio to beat the CIR tests."
"In order for such a review to be triggered, the offending test result has to be so unusual that there’s a 99.9 percent chance that it’s a true positive. So if there’s only a 99 percent chance, that’s not good enough. This means there’s room for athletes who are very likely, but not conclusively, doping to slip through. ......... YIKES, SO THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS REALLY ON THE TESTERS"
"Still, even as technology has improved, the proportion of worldwide samples that test positive remains at about one to two percent year after year. The dopers and anti-dopers may be in technological lockstep."
.Last edited by ADP02; 09-28-2015, 02:02 AM.
Comment
Comment